From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] glamor: Route fillspans and polyfillrects to glamor. Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:07:41 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1321000281-5097-1-git-send-email-zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com> <1321000281-5097-3-git-send-email-zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714469E77F for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:07:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1321000281-5097-3-git-send-email-zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Zhigang Gong , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:31:21 +0800, Zhigang Gong wrote: > If GLAMOR is enabled, we route UXA's fillspans and > polyfillrects to glamor by default. And if glamor > fail to accelerate it, UXA continue to handle it. How is serialisation handled between the UXA and glamor acceleration routines? Don't you need to flush the UXA batch (if the pixmap is active) before handing over to glamor and similarly flush the glamor pixmap after failure? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre