From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E825CC433E0 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 07:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD6E620775 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 07:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=amdcloud.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@amdcloud.onmicrosoft.com header.b="waNVd5Vp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BD6E620775 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=amd.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3296E400; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 07:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam12on2083.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.244.83]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 837666E3DF; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 07:03:39 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=N/CgkoHAPEqcN1OvkTzJEw4tJFkqKdIDURzNT1kczz6UAyIZR2v1zcc8DsNTErjYf1JIM7MPHyEhHisdE2qoT8rIsSYgwWhYHOvLCUnr0nnqKpVQSilYjdSJ0y4uocF2b2UJC2bxmU+VayeBsGPoj3S5lzuCyec3wubq61YyMtU7WX0dETUHbDclYvB8RZtH5cgYQR7mjPRgNuS4ANdD6Eu5PNuA5T7lhZ6IN4oh1zjmkSPnjXW4x7b6qBm8q4rj8w/VYnCnbCK/z2TfUsYbFQijJKxtO/YNqwtNivghRbABVGDHFkYWvNAdueccmjuqOSZ8nhVtm6pAYXKb9fAIDg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=0uRyc1P/GUihBU1D58/gOHcQ+pFi9gfFOL8PnXOM1eM=; b=HFDbWRmyYBGnY1NDfA5qgjxC9dxdLi6lEbHJXABUk00Dt9CDRGoMIYjCO7KifnvlXGgppxrFa8IHZQGEQUdasvJchYHn4hnnKt3hv49RuvNrM5URFOMDTTLgG6znRvahzxezNuy48FcwOPVdJDYljBTQrVmwd22V/dcSr65W2qzVA2fHjo7G1/7cjL/QPxzC3IYi36AO46nB6+v4ZxwfoKYK0fzAiuJEoBSgvuFtQPViIeiPgWXBNHbzJGXq93PRbhFr0WnFVJUF1Ua7T3NFCSeOLX9aiGBKBCr7AFUCxrA6ezzzqPfmLhlHAN5ixEUmTn3TYiLg3cApAi3O33PaJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=pass header.d=amd.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amdcloud.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-amdcloud-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=0uRyc1P/GUihBU1D58/gOHcQ+pFi9gfFOL8PnXOM1eM=; b=waNVd5Vp+UsZc8PZXxvOiSZxJxIn+KPkueMkD5pxoPf0Rl72KO8jDffjyQkuxGAYB0fa7IxxyauQDgb+M4dKyIJc2d+3xGWdZ8oNnsiqK60nfCRf15gwjLW8kaYHpYQzC7AG0BMhRAIAr1vuAo57O68i68Xk04kKd5PQH1PG6CE= Authentication-Results: suse.de; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;suse.de; dmarc=none action=none header.from=amd.com; Received: from DM6PR12MB4401.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:2a9::15) by DM6PR12MB3433.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:38::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.21; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 07:03:37 +0000 Received: from DM6PR12MB4401.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a045:f8c0:8edb:1ef1]) by DM6PR12MB4401.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a045:f8c0:8edb:1ef1%9]) with mapi id 15.20.3131.025; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 07:03:37 +0000 To: Sumit Semwal , Daniel Vetter References: <20200625123443.19680-1-lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> <51e00eed-c8f1-aabf-ec2c-07be0453ab3b@amd.com> <874kqzndxj.fsf@intel.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:03:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-ClientProxiedBy: AM0PR07CA0021.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:ac::34) To DM6PR12MB4401.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:2a9::15) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [IPv6:2a02:908:1252:fb60:be8a:bd56:1f94:86e7] (2a02:908:1252:fb60:be8a:bd56:1f94:86e7) by AM0PR07CA0021.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:ac::34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.10 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 07:03:36 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [2a02:908:1252:fb60:be8a:bd56:1f94:86e7] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-HT: Tenant X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 16b2f4da-b1dd-4d73-2af9-08d8199f0caa X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DM6PR12MB3433: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:10000; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0446F0FCE1 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: vbTDJV6aQZyCLH635DvKVI9LzG/c3T//1+7OuKIB5+ZPQ9yoGltmAqTpPG/domS4ioH3zvRGH7pKp6JFKw/xX8mtOV1OvjG9F/5Jf7SS8SeuILFF4K4XKEhptRq6jEXRhuYaHENLwSc4SPtPWDMkBnqzBNkBmFgHRjr9RVLLbJOOx9asjtSUfcqc2pkq9661ZgYiMTV4y+7cXzm0p4/RZcGvVXrkey7BwLafuOgsBG/Sfo3Q6IhLbx7UwQnDtd9yUV6hPNwW7y/BIfaFoXX3+apyOROUTOP8MVoKftyoT2VhcDetvxJbOhc7qD0s9oUCHfc1ICLp+XhVFJdleIRvAVLQCzVmd0PwAxOj7BohA3h+tH1oVFI0gqFm6vDa4sUV X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR12MB4401.namprd12.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(5660300002)(54906003)(36756003)(31696002)(66556008)(86362001)(8676002)(110136005)(478600001)(6486002)(316002)(83380400001)(8936002)(53546011)(52116002)(66476007)(66946007)(6666004)(186003)(16526019)(2906002)(31686004)(4326008)(2616005)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 16b2f4da-b1dd-4d73-2af9-08d8199f0caa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6PR12MB4401.namprd12.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jun 2020 07:03:37.7322 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: lDpXOmdKq2XPiY0npkH0fyGli98xGsmXbA5YZd7aASbCQLICI2+iwDaDhH9aP750 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR12MB3433 Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "dma-buf: Report signaled links inside dma-fence-chain" X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Zimmermann , Intel Graphics Development , dri-devel , Chris Wilson Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" Am 26.06.20 um 06:43 schrieb Sumit Semwal: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:24, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Ignoring everything else ... >> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:28 PM Jani Nikula wrote: >>> As a side note, there seem to be extra checks in place for acks when >>> applying non-i915 patches to drm-intel; there are no such checks for >>> drm-misc. >> One option to generalize that that I pondered is to consult >> get_maintainers.pl asking for git repo link, and if that returns >> something else, then insist that there's an ack from a relevant >> maintainer. It's a bit of typing, but I think the bigger problem is >> that there's a ton of false positives. > Right; for the particular patch, I wasn't even in the to: or cc: field > and that made it slip from my radar. I would definitely ask any one > sending patches for dma-buf directory to follow the get_maintainers.pl > religiously. >> But maybe that's a good thing, would give some motivation to keep >> MAINTAINERS updated. Should I maybe add myself as maintainer as well? I've written enough stuff in there to know the code quite a bit. Christian. >> >> The other issue is though that drm-misc is plenty used to merge >> patches even when the respective maintainers are absent for weeks, or >> unresponsive. If we just blindly implement that rule, then the only >> possible Ack for these would be Dave&me as subsystem maintainers, and >> I don't want to be in the business of stamping approvals for all this >> stuff. Much better if people just collaborate. >> >> So I think an ack check would be nice, but probably not practical. >> >> Plus in this situation here drm-misc.git actually is the main repo, >> and we wont ever be able to teach a script to make a judgement call of >> whether that patch has the right amount of review on it. >> -Daniel > Best, > Sumit. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx