From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc8 regressions Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:34:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20110314090811.GA4779@x61s.reliablesolutions.de> <20110316174654.GA24936@jannic.reliablesolutions.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71BE9E924 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:35:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110316174654.GA24936@jannic.reliablesolutions.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Jan Niehusmann Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:46:55 +0100, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > With that patch applied, I still observed the described behaviour. > Additionally, some java application had display update problems. (But > java generally has some problems because I'm using a non-reparenting > window manager, 'awesome', which java doesn't like). > > What do you think, would it be worthwhile to try a more recent version > of xf86-video-intel? Ok, that's more worrying. That bug certainly matched what you describe, and I don't offhand know of another commit since 2.13 that is relevant. It would be good to double-check first though. Have you harvested any i915_error_states? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre