From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [bisected] commit 176f28eb breaks my Sandybridge
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 13:22:55 +0000
Message-ID: <b9dded$h0kggv@orsmga002.jf.intel.com>
References: <87k4kspu7i.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<b9dded$h02sp9@orsmga002.jf.intel.com>
	<87eib0prxo.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<20101107130916.GB13815@zhen-devel.sh.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7A69E782
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sun,  7 Nov 2010 05:22:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20101107130916.GB13815@zhen-devel.sh.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 21:09:16 +0800, Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 2010.11.04 16:52:51 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > > Having the error there was to make sure people noticed and I
> > > could find out just how many SNB revisions failed. I presume you have a
> > > rev 8?
> > 
> > Yes, rev 8 here.
> > 
> 
> FYI, rev 9 desktop sandybridge doesn't show this issue so far.
> It just reads back correct values.

Thanks, I've pushed a patch to -next to not throw an error for SNB rev <= 8
so those of us with the reticent hw can get back to finding bugs.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre