From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: forcewake struct mutex locking fixes Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 18:00:33 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1303343599-18509-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> <1303343599-18509-4-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> <20110422162016.GB27642@bwgnt.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614559E807 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:01:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110422162016.GB27642@bwgnt.jf.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Ben Widawsky Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:20:17 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > I don't understand what you're asking for. I'm pretty convinced I need > the mutex protected intel_update_fbc, because the call trace could be: > > intel_update_fbc() > intel_enable_fbc() > ironlake_enable_fbc() > sandybridge_blit_fbc_update() > gen6_gt_force_wake_get() > > > Could you elaborate? It's a pre-ILK code path, so no magic GT handling required. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre