From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Change use get_new_plane_state instead of existing plane state
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 09:55:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <becddd07-ffcf-7018-b004-63ee85dfe6d1@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13f9dcfc-b2dd-64e2-95b0-17ea35f4eac4@intel.com>
Op 01-08-17 om 08:36 schreef Mahesh Kumar:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Thursday 20 July 2017 06:45 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> The get_existing macros are deprecated and should be replaced by
>> get_old/new_state for clarity.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 4 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 5 ++---
>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c
>> index 36d4e635e4ce..5d9a26fa5f6d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c
>> @@ -301,8 +301,8 @@ int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> continue;
>> }
>> - plane_state = intel_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(drm_state,
>> - intel_plane);
>> + plane_state = intel_atomic_get_new_plane_state(drm_state,
>> + intel_plane);
>> scaler_id = &plane_state->scaler_id;
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> index 4f9775a05df7..f59507137347 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> @@ -1958,12 +1958,12 @@ intel_atomic_get_existing_crtc_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>> }
>> static inline struct intel_plane_state *
>> -intel_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>> +intel_atomic_get_new_plane_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>> struct intel_plane *plane)
> please fix indentation of arguments as well.
>
>> {
>> struct drm_plane_state *plane_state;
>> - plane_state = drm_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(state, &plane->base);
>> + plane_state = drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state(state, &plane->base);
>> return to_intel_plane_state(plane_state);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> index 48785ef75d33..0cdb9453e0e2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> @@ -3028,8 +3028,7 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
>> for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, intel_crtc, intel_plane) {
>> struct intel_plane_state *ps;
>> - ps = intel_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(state,
>> - intel_plane);
>> + ps = intel_atomic_get_new_plane_state(state, intel_plane);
>> if (!ps)
>> continue;
>> @@ -4766,7 +4765,7 @@ skl_ddb_add_affected_planes(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
>> struct drm_plane *plane;
>> enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
>> - WARN_ON(!drm_atomic_get_existing_crtc_state(state, crtc));
>> + WARN_ON(!drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc));
> Patch talks about changing get_existing_plane_state, but you are changing get_existing_crtc_state here.
> IMO it should be part of different patch or patch subject should be changed.
Yeah ok, this hunk should be separate.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-01 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-20 13:15 [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Stop using get_existing_state Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-20 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Change use get_new_plane_state instead of existing plane state Maarten Lankhorst
2017-08-01 6:36 ` Mahesh Kumar
2017-08-01 7:55 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2017-07-20 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Change get_existing_crtc_state to old state Maarten Lankhorst
2017-08-01 6:46 ` Mahesh Kumar
2017-08-01 7:53 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-08-01 8:04 ` Mahesh Kumar
2017-07-20 13:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Use new atomic helpers in intel_plane_atomic_check Maarten Lankhorst
2017-08-01 7:57 ` Mahesh Kumar
2017-07-20 13:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Use intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state in intel_fbc.c Maarten Lankhorst
2017-08-01 8:00 ` Mahesh Kumar
2017-07-20 13:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Remove last references to drm_atomic_get_existing* macros Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-20 13:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Do not update legacy state any more Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-20 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Calculate ironlake intermediate watermarks correctly, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-20 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Calculate vlv/chv intermediate watermarks correctly, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-20 16:26 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-20 15:40 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Stop using get_existing_state Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=becddd07-ffcf-7018-b004-63ee85dfe6d1@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mahesh1.kumar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox