From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22EEEC433FE for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 10:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E9E10E0D3; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 10:24:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A7D310E0D3 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 10:24:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1667903054; x=1699439054; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8pGKrlQVDGTtkWI1yvckQgAXCUhXLDgyoGzu6YzIGVI=; b=HSqrGyxPVWPAkZsuAZ4ydmRwsdlO90H0LHnzDwqke2Srb5vCM7Ism7qj +MfjZN3H52tqd3j+bgxJ1L0UDxdg+uTk/HCgLVkL8qTna3TdAYefFqbwc jScr2BNIN9XOtxNG0O74plGe4tKx1EbuVP0jZq1BOzQYq074cSHyKMpFc clGoUTaOw1uyfJh+iMvGRjbE3VkCu6pEi4i6OdaDUfVmTkW/Suws/eazb hFZgkMU4zPFeR6FdXn1YALfQDJknSH9usczWMwUDjd/6T5dHFz8pkpNOL Z0ZCPdSdQKSBb4fK0judtZ7oXA1fohgP+O83JIxQUbFWFHFgfcGs0lzEK w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10524"; a="298176320" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,147,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="298176320" Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Nov 2022 02:24:13 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10524"; a="638742008" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,147,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="638742008" Received: from tprzyluc-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.16.225]) ([10.252.16.225]) by fmsmga007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Nov 2022 02:24:10 -0800 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 10:24:09 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.4.1 Content-Language: en-GB To: Andrzej Hajda , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20221019215906.295296-1-andrzej.hajda@intel.com> <20221019215906.295296-2-andrzej.hajda@intel.com> From: Matthew Auld In-Reply-To: <20221019215906.295296-2-andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: call i915_request_await_object from _i915_vma_move_to_active X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Lucas De Marchi , Rodrigo Vivi Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 19/10/2022 22:59, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > Since almost all calls to i915_vma_move_to_active are prepended with > i915_request_await_object, let's call the latter from > _i915_vma_move_to_active by default and add flag allowing bypassing it. > Adjust all callers accordingly. > The patch should not introduce functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda I thought someone already reviewed this series. Anyway, Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld