From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Transform WaInPlaceDecompressionHang to a simple reg write
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:17:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cda4e694-7958-cfe4-4b28-77060b48ec74@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504732331-6178-1-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Hey Mika,
Regarding this patch: is there a consensus on where is the most
appropriate place to apply workarounds? My understanding is that
per-context workarounds (WAS_SET_BIT, etc...) go in
xxx_init_workarounds, while those that are needed only during
initialization (I915_WRITE) go in xxx_init_clock_gating. But it doesn't
look like this general rule is being followed (probably because
xxx_init_clock_gating is a very misleading name?).
This has probably been discussed before, so it would be good if we could
document the answer somewhere (maybe it already is?).
Thanks,
Oscar
On 09/06/2017 02:12 PM, Oscar Mateo wrote:
> Afaict, GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA does not live in the context, so writing
> it on every context creation is overkill (and wrong).
>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> index 23812ec..9f01a5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -985,8 +985,9 @@ static int skl_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>
> /* WaInPlaceDecompressionHang:skl */
> if (IS_SKL_REVID(dev_priv, SKL_REVID_H0, REVID_FOREVER))
> - WA_SET_BIT(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA,
> - GAMT_ECO_ENABLE_IN_PLACE_DECOMPRESS);
> + I915_WRITE(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA,
> + (I915_READ(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA) |
> + GAMT_ECO_ENABLE_IN_PLACE_DECOMPRESS);
>
> /* WaDisableLSQCROPERFforOCL:skl */
> ret = wa_ring_whitelist_reg(engine, GEN8_L3SQCREG4);
> @@ -1059,8 +1060,9 @@ static int bxt_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>
> /* WaInPlaceDecompressionHang:bxt */
> if (IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, BXT_REVID_C0, REVID_FOREVER))
> - WA_SET_BIT(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA,
> - GAMT_ECO_ENABLE_IN_PLACE_DECOMPRESS);
> + I915_WRITE(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA,
> + (I915_READ(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA) |
> + GAMT_ECO_ENABLE_IN_PLACE_DECOMPRESS);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1089,8 +1091,9 @@ static int cnl_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> GEN8_CSC2_SBE_VUE_CACHE_CONSERVATIVE);
>
> /* WaInPlaceDecompressionHang:cnl */
> - WA_SET_BIT(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA,
> - GAMT_ECO_ENABLE_IN_PLACE_DECOMPRESS);
> + I915_WRITE(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA,
> + (I915_READ(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA) |
> + GAMT_ECO_ENABLE_IN_PLACE_DECOMPRESS);
>
> /* WaPushConstantDereferenceHoldDisable:cnl */
> WA_SET_BIT(GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2, PUSH_CONSTANT_DEREF_DISABLE);
> @@ -1143,8 +1146,9 @@ static int kbl_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> GEN7_SBE_SS_CACHE_DISPATCH_PORT_SHARING_DISABLE);
>
> /* WaInPlaceDecompressionHang:kbl */
> - WA_SET_BIT(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA,
> - GAMT_ECO_ENABLE_IN_PLACE_DECOMPRESS);
> + I915_WRITE(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA,
> + (I915_READ(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA) |
> + GAMT_ECO_ENABLE_IN_PLACE_DECOMPRESS);
>
> /* WaDisableLSQCROPERFforOCL:kbl */
> ret = wa_ring_whitelist_reg(engine, GEN8_L3SQCREG4);
> @@ -1196,8 +1200,9 @@ static int cfl_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> GEN7_SBE_SS_CACHE_DISPATCH_PORT_SHARING_DISABLE);
>
> /* WaInPlaceDecompressionHang:cfl */
> - WA_SET_BIT(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA,
> - GAMT_ECO_ENABLE_IN_PLACE_DECOMPRESS);
> + I915_WRITE(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA,
> + (I915_READ(GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA) |
> + GAMT_ECO_ENABLE_IN_PLACE_DECOMPRESS);
>
> return 0;
> }
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-06 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-06 21:12 [PATCH] drm/i915: Transform WaInPlaceDecompressionHang to a simple reg write Oscar Mateo
2017-09-06 21:17 ` Oscar Mateo [this message]
2017-09-07 9:30 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-09-07 15:50 ` Oscar Mateo
2017-09-06 21:19 ` Chris Wilson
2017-09-06 21:27 ` Oscar Mateo
2017-09-06 21:43 ` Chris Wilson
2017-09-06 21:51 ` Oscar Mateo
2017-09-07 11:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-09-08 7:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-09-06 21:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cda4e694-7958-cfe4-4b28-77060b48ec74@intel.com \
--to=oscar.mateo@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kuoppala@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox