From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_RANDOM_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4A1C388F7 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94243223BF for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:22:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 94243223BF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EFE6E198; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F36926E198 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:22:15 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: y4Y6HEzs9eFWECK+5ThdjJjSY26YO3VsvLK2WDALSX79t/hLkNby4OoCBUvr7NfPtutV8dmlfE oqstXttzIk/A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9781"; a="252242456" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,404,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="252242456" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Oct 2020 08:22:13 -0700 IronPort-SDR: bxjBFIhhv6pc/Ht4v+8jBwQRxVK6lNCKyxiZr/H/IUYuyB3RMkeyaYJNcEIE4iWGR4Ec+2hp/E 4rzSSjwsqTwg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,404,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="534008722" Received: from peterhae-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.41.22]) ([10.249.41.22]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Oct 2020 08:22:12 -0700 To: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com, Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org References: <20201015182901.3197788-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> From: Tvrtko Ursulin Organization: Intel Corporation UK Plc Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:22:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201015182901.3197788-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH CI v2 0/4] drm/i915/guc: Update to GuC v49 X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" + Joonas for maintainer class question. On 15/10/2020 19:28, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote: > From: John Harrison > > Update to the latest GuC firmware > > v2: Rebase to newer tree, updated a commit message (review feedback > from Daniele) and dropped the patch to enable GuC/HuC loading by > default as apparently this is not allowed. > > Signed-off-by: John Harrison > > > John Harrison (4): > drm/i915/guc: Update to use firmware v49.0.1 > drm/i915/guc: Improved reporting when GuC fails to load > drm/i915/guc: Clear pointers on free > CI: turn on GuC/HuC auto mode by default > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 3 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c | 18 --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c | 132 +++++++++++++++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fw.c | 31 +++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h | 80 +++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h | 5 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c | 29 ++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.h | 2 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw_abi.h | 6 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h | 2 +- > 11 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-) I tried to merge this for John today but the series applies to drm-intel-next-queued and not drm-intel-gt-next, which I thought is where GT/GuC should go to. Long story short, where to merge GuC patches and how is the question? Regards, Tvrtko _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx