From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 00/20] drm/i915/display: convert to generic poll_timeout_us()
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 15:20:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1756383233.git.jani.nikula@intel.com> (raw)
Completely remove the remaining custom i915_utils.h wait macro usage
from display code, and unify on the kernel generic poll_timeout_us()
poll waiter. Also convert existing read_poll_timeout() and
readx_poll_timeout() to poll_timeout_us().
This is a rewrite of [1] switching to the new poll_timeout_us() instead
of read_poll_timeout().
The main functional change is losing the exponentially growing sleep
from the custom macros. This is highlighted in each commit message with
details.
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1751023767.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Jani Nikula (20):
drm/i915/hdmi: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of __wait_for()
drm/i915/hdcp: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of __wait_for()
drm/i915/hdcp: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for()
drm/i915/dsi: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for_us()
drm/i915/dsi-pll: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for()
drm/i915/gmbus: use generic poll_timeout*() instead of wait_for*()
drm/i915/wm: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for()
drm/i915/cdclk: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for()
drm/i915/power: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for()
drm/i915/power-well: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of
wait_for() for DKL PHY
drm/i915/power-well: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of
wait_for() for VLV/CHV
drm/i915/dp: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for()
drm/i915/dp: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() in
link training
drm/i915/vblank: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for()
drm/i915/tc: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for()
drm/i915/dsb: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for()
drm/i915/lspcon: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for()
drm/i915/opregion: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for()
drm/i915/ddi: prefer poll_timeout_us() over readx_poll_timeout()
drm/i915/pps: prefer poll_timeout_us() over read_poll_timeout()
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c | 16 +++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 18 ++++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 37 ++++++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 32 +++++---------
.../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 7 +++-
.../i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c | 42 +++++++++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++-----
.../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 17 ++++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c | 10 ++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c | 13 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 25 ++++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c | 10 ++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c | 13 ++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c | 10 +++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 8 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 16 ++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c | 9 +++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi_pll.c | 11 +++--
18 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
--
2.47.2
next reply other threads:[~2025-08-28 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 12:20 Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 01/20] drm/i915/hdmi: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of __wait_for() Jani Nikula
2025-09-03 13:29 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-09-04 11:26 ` Jani Nikula
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 02/20] drm/i915/hdcp: " Jani Nikula
2025-09-03 13:42 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 03/20] drm/i915/hdcp: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 4:14 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 04/20] drm/i915/dsi: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for_us() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 4:27 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 05/20] drm/i915/dsi-pll: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 4:34 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 06/20] drm/i915/gmbus: use generic poll_timeout*() instead of wait_for*() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 4:53 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 07/20] drm/i915/wm: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 5:01 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 08/20] drm/i915/cdclk: " Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 5:45 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 09/20] drm/i915/power: " Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 5:47 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 10/20] drm/i915/power-well: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() for DKL PHY Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 5:48 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 11/20] drm/i915/power-well: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() for VLV/CHV Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 5:54 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 12/20] drm/i915/dp: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 6:08 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 13/20] drm/i915/dp: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() in link training Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 6:15 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 14/20] drm/i915/vblank: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 8:05 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 15/20] drm/i915/tc: " Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 8:41 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 16/20] drm/i915/dsb: " Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 8:42 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 17/20] drm/i915/lspcon: " Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 8:47 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:21 ` [PATCH 18/20] drm/i915/opregion: " Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 9:06 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:21 ` [PATCH 19/20] drm/i915/ddi: prefer poll_timeout_us() over readx_poll_timeout() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 9:19 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:21 ` [PATCH 20/20] drm/i915/pps: prefer poll_timeout_us() over read_poll_timeout() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 10:23 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 17:44 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: convert to generic poll_timeout_us() Patchwork
2025-08-29 0:27 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1756383233.git.jani.nikula@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).