From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/i915/edp: eDP Data Overrride
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 12:41:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1124158037cf3cb0ee9f9912e9c067f707befaa@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250819080602.84826-4-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> We need override certain link rates in favour of the next available
> higher link rate. The Link rates that need to be overridden are
> indicated by a mask in VBT. To make sure these modes are skipped we
> don't add them in them in the sink rates array.
>
> --v2
> -Update the link rates after we have a final set of link rates [Ankit]
> -Break this patch up [Ankit]
> -Optimize the assingment during loop [Ankit]
>
> --v3
> -Add protection against broken VBTs [Jani]
>
> --v4
> -Fix build errors
> -Create a seprate function to check if edp data override is selected
> and using the correct vbt
>
> --v5
> -Use correct number to check the num of edp rates [Ankit]
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index 444ed54f7c35..05a74c3bc9af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -2521,11 +2521,24 @@ int intel_bios_dp_max_lane_count(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata)
> bool
> intel_bios_encoder_reject_edp_rate(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata,
> int rate)
> +{
> + return devdata->child.edp_data_rate_override & edp_rate_override_mask(rate);
> +}
> +
> +bool
> +intel_bios_vbt_supports_edp_data_override(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata)
Why are you adding this function? Earlier versions didn't have it, and
the reason for its existence isn't explained or clear.
BR,
Jani.
> {
> if (!devdata || devdata->display->vbt.version < 263)
> return false;
>
> - return devdata->child.edp_data_rate_override & edp_rate_override_mask(rate);
> + /*
> + * This means the VBT ends up asking us to override every possible rate
> + * indicating the VBT is broken so skip this
> + */
> + if (hweight32(devdata->child.edp_data_rate_override) >= BDB_263_VBT_EDP_NUM_RATES)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> }
>
> static void sanitize_device_type(struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
> index 781e08f7eeb2..d24660bcc7f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
> @@ -276,5 +276,7 @@ void intel_bios_for_each_encoder(struct intel_display *display,
> const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata));
>
> void intel_bios_debugfs_register(struct intel_display *display);
> +bool
> +intel_bios_vbt_supports_edp_data_override(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata);
>
> #endif /* _INTEL_BIOS_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 54d88f24b689..f6fad42182ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4277,6 +4277,26 @@ static void intel_edp_mso_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> intel_dp->mso_pixel_overlap = mso ? info->mso_pixel_overlap : 0;
> }
>
> +static void
> +intel_edp_set_data_override_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
> + int *sink_rates = intel_dp->sink_rates;
> + int i, j = 0;
> +
> + if (!intel_bios_vbt_supports_edp_data_override(encoder->devdata))
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < intel_dp->num_sink_rates; i++) {
> + if (intel_bios_encoder_reject_edp_rate(encoder->devdata,
> + intel_dp->sink_rates[i]))
> + continue;
> +
> + sink_rates[j++] = intel_dp->sink_rates[i];
> + }
> + intel_dp->num_sink_rates = j;
> +}
> +
> static void
> intel_edp_set_sink_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> @@ -4327,6 +4347,8 @@ intel_edp_set_sink_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> intel_dp->use_rate_select = true;
> else
> intel_dp_set_sink_rates(intel_dp);
> +
> + intel_edp_set_data_override_rates(intel_dp);
> }
>
> static bool
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-19 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-19 8:05 [PATCH v5 0/3] eDP Data Override Suraj Kandpal
2025-08-19 8:06 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/i915/vbt: Add eDP Data rate overrride field in VBT Suraj Kandpal
2025-08-19 9:16 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-08-19 8:06 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/i915/bios: Add function to check if edp data override is needed Suraj Kandpal
2025-08-19 8:06 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/i915/edp: eDP Data Overrride Suraj Kandpal
2025-08-19 9:30 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-08-19 9:41 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-08-19 12:03 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-08-19 12:20 ` Jani Nikula
2025-08-20 8:07 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-08-19 11:13 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for eDP Data Override (rev6) Patchwork
2025-08-19 14:57 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d1124158037cf3cb0ee9f9912e9c067f707befaa@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).