Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3 0/3] Introduce Raptor Lake S

Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-12-08T09:52:06Z

On 06/12/2021 04:29, Srivatsa, Anusha wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 2:57 PM
>> To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>; intel-
>> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: x86@kernel.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Ingo Molnar
>> <mingo@redhat.com>; Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>; Dave Hansen
>> <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>; Joonas Lahtinen
>> <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>; Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [v3 0/3] Introduce Raptor Lake S
>>
>>
>> On 03/12/2021 06:35, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
>>> Raptor Lake S(RPL-S) is a version 12
>>> Display, Media and Render. For all i915 purposes it is the same as
>>> Alder Lake S (ADL-S).
>>>
>>> The series introduces it as a subplatform of ADL-S. The one difference
>>> is the GuC submission which is default on RPL-S but was not the case
>>> with ADL-S.
>>
>> As a side note, not a blocker of any kind, I am slightly disheartened but the
>> confusion of ADL_P and ADL_S being separate platforms, but then RPL_S is
>> subplatform of ADL_S. Maybe it is just me not being able to keep track of
>> things.
>>
>>> All patches are reviewed. Jani has acked the series.
>>> Looking for other acks in order to merge these to respective branches.
>>
>> Which branches would that be for this series? First two to drm-intel-next and
>> last one to drm-intel-gt-next? Is that complication needed and/or worth the
>> effort?
>
> Tvrtko,
> All three have to land to drm-intel-next. The last one has dependency on the first patch and is a trivial change.

One more ack for a good measure:

Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko