From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/atomic: Clean up drm_atomic_helper_async_check
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:11:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db5b893f-8ed8-6c40-011d-3c82e52cb46f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170725082305.lodeuonv37l6kbz2@phenom.ffwll.local>
Op 25-07-17 om 10:23 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:39:15PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Instead of assigning plane to __plane, iterate over plane
>> which is the same thing. Simplify the check for n_planes != 1,
>> at that point we know plane != NULL as well.
>>
>> Rename obj_state to new_obj_state, and get rid of the bogus stuff.
>> crtc->state->state is NEVER non-null, if it is, there is a bug.
>> We should definitely try to prevent async updates if there are flips
>> queued, but this code will simply not be executed and needs to be
>> rethought.
>>
>> Also remove the loop too, because we're trying to loop over the crtc until
>> we find plane_state->crtc == crtc, which we already know is non-zero.
>> It's dead code anyway. :)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 56 ++++++++++---------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
>> index a46b51291006..c538528a794a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
>> @@ -1372,68 +1372,42 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_async_check(struct drm_device *dev,
>> struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>> {
>> struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>> - struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>> - struct drm_crtc_commit *commit;
>> - struct drm_plane *__plane, *plane = NULL;
>> - struct drm_plane_state *__plane_state, *plane_state = NULL;
>> + struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
>> + struct drm_plane *plane;
>> + struct drm_plane_state *new_plane_state;
>> const struct drm_plane_helper_funcs *funcs;
>> - int i, j, n_planes = 0;
>> + int i, n_planes = 0;
>>
>> - for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
>> - if (drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state))
>> + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
>> + if (drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(new_crtc_state))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - for_each_new_plane_in_state(state, __plane, __plane_state, i) {
>> + for_each_new_plane_in_state(state, plane, new_plane_state, i)
>> n_planes++;
>> - plane = __plane;
>> - plane_state = __plane_state;
>> - }
>>
>> /* FIXME: we support only single plane updates for now */
>> - if (!plane || n_planes != 1)
>> + if (n_planes != 1)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - if (!plane_state->crtc)
>> + if (!new_plane_state->crtc)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> funcs = plane->helper_private;
>> if (!funcs->atomic_async_update)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - if (plane_state->fence)
>> + if (new_plane_state->fence)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> /*
>> - * Don't do an async update if there is an outstanding commit modifying
>> - * the plane. This prevents our async update's changes from getting
>> - * overridden by a previous synchronous update's state.
>> + * FIXME: We should prevent an async update if there is an outstanding
>> + * commit modifying the plane. This prevents our async update's
>> + * changes from getting overwritten by a previous synchronous update's
>> + * state.
>> */
>> - for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
>> - if (plane->crtc != crtc)
>> - continue;
>> -
>> - spin_lock(&crtc->commit_lock);
>> - commit = list_first_entry_or_null(&crtc->commit_list,
>> - struct drm_crtc_commit,
>> - commit_entry);
>> - if (!commit) {
>> - spin_unlock(&crtc->commit_lock);
>> - continue;
>> - }
>> - spin_unlock(&crtc->commit_lock);
>> -
>> - if (!crtc->state->state)
>> - continue;
>> -
>> - for_each_plane_in_state(crtc->state->state, __plane,
>> - __plane_state, j) {
> I'm pretty sure this oopses, because crtc->state->state is NULL after
> commit. I think Gustavo needs to review this first (and write a nasty igt
> testcase to catch it) before we remove this. I think the correct check is
> to simply bail out if our current crtc has a pending commit (i.e.
> !list_empty(&crtc->commit_list) should be all we need to check.
It didn't oops. Right above it was a null check. It was never executed. :)
obj->state->state is always NULL. Excluding a brief moment during swap_state where this may oops, this code willl never do a thing.
> But I think we need a testcase for this.
>
> Otherwise the patch looks ok I think.
> -Daniel
>
>
>> - if (__plane == plane)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> - }
>>
>> - return funcs->atomic_async_check(plane, plane_state);
>> + return funcs->atomic_async_check(plane, new_plane_state);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_helper_async_check);
>>
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-19 14:39 [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/atomic: Remove deprecated atomic iterator macros, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-19 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/atomic: Use new iterator macros in drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done, again Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-25 8:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-19 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/atomic: Clean up drm_atomic_helper_async_check Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-25 8:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-25 9:11 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2017-07-25 9:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-25 10:36 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-19 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/rcar-du: Use new iterator macros, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-25 8:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-26 11:53 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-07-29 20:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-07-19 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/omapdrm: Fix omap_atomic_wait_for_completion Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-25 8:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-08-01 9:50 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-19 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/msm: Convert to use new iterator macros, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-19 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/nouveau: Convert nouveau " Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-25 9:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-19 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/atomic: Remove deprecated accessor macros Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-25 9:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-19 15:12 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/atomic: Remove deprecated atomic iterator macros, v2 Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db5b893f-8ed8-6c40-011d-3c82e52cb46f@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox