HiĀ  Andi, On 7/21/2023 6:15 PM, Andi Shyti wrote: > Just a trivial refactoring for reducing the number of code > duplicate. This will come at handy in the next commits. > > Meantime, propagate the error to the above layers if we fail to > emit the pipe control. > > Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti > Cc: # v5.8+ > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c | 47 +++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c > index 139a7e69f5c4d..5e19b45a5cabe 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > #include "i915_drv.h" > #include "intel_engine_regs.h" > #include "intel_gpu_commands.h" > +#include "intel_gt_print.h" > #include "intel_lrc.h" > #include "intel_ring.h" > > @@ -189,23 +190,30 @@ u32 *gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 *cs, const i915_reg_t inv > return cs; > } > > +static int gen12_emit_pipe_control_cs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 bit_group_0, > + u32 bit_group_1, u32 offset) > +{ > + u32 *cs; > + > + cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 6); > + if (IS_ERR(cs)) > + return PTR_ERR(cs); > + > + cs = gen12_emit_pipe_control(cs, bit_group_0, bit_group_1, > + LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > + intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int mtl_dummy_pipe_control(struct i915_request *rq) > { > /* Wa_14016712196 */ > if (IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(rq->engine->i915, M, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) || > - IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(rq->engine->i915, P, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) { > - u32 *cs; > - > - /* dummy PIPE_CONTROL + depth flush */ > - cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 6); > - if (IS_ERR(cs)) > - return PTR_ERR(cs); > - cs = gen12_emit_pipe_control(cs, > - 0, > - PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH, > - LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > - intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); > - } > + IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(rq->engine->i915, P, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) > + return gen12_emit_pipe_control_cs(rq, 0, > + PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH, > + LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); Don't think this will get backported to 5.8+. I think mtl introduced after that. If that is not an issue for rest of the series and then |Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das Regards, Nirmoy | > > return 0; > } > @@ -222,7 +230,6 @@ int gen12_emit_flush_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode) > u32 bit_group_0 = 0; > u32 bit_group_1 = 0; > int err; > - u32 *cs; > > err = mtl_dummy_pipe_control(rq); > if (err) > @@ -256,13 +263,11 @@ int gen12_emit_flush_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode) > else if (engine->class == COMPUTE_CLASS) > bit_group_1 &= ~PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ENGINE_FLAGS; > > - cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 6); > - if (IS_ERR(cs)) > - return PTR_ERR(cs); > - > - cs = gen12_emit_pipe_control(cs, bit_group_0, bit_group_1, > - LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > - intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); > + err = gen12_emit_pipe_control_cs(rq, bit_group_0, bit_group_1, > + LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > + if (err) > + gt_warn(engine->gt, > + "Failed to emit flush pipe control\n"); > } > > if (mode & EMIT_INVALIDATE) {