From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B72DC63798 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 01:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B71C0206F9 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 01:51:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B71C0206F9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459DE6E581; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 01:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D7566E581 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 01:51:50 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: u2nwv/rOFrnBxI40gY90eVd1Eyab0nvGOr3uQGwg/IUL6/r7/rlNdtj3FwL1oWpjYFZd82baKq dfSi04DDuUjg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9817"; a="160112912" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,373,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="160112912" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Nov 2020 17:51:49 -0800 IronPort-SDR: pzZfEjcbbXsj4s7s73nUVpfDvWKSmE07ZQjnjC23jff/Sz97bd5OoHA+DZZhEACrnr/8yzu93d Hg7xkpQfTlFQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,373,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="547895306" Received: from xingzhen-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.238.4.68]) ([10.238.4.68]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Nov 2020 17:51:43 -0800 To: Chris Wilson , Joonas Lahtinen , Oliver Sang References: <20201111155811.GB24657@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <160527763346.5566.3471508802857132043@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20201119072018.GA15197@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <160625087275.29168.7080737993781611765@build.alporthouse.com> <160642644736.15379.9850669928715684163@build.alporthouse.com> From: Xing Zhengjun Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:51:41 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <160642644736.15379.9850669928715684163@build.alporthouse.com> Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/gem] 59dd13ad31: phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second -54.0% regression X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: feng.tang@intel.com, tiejun.li@intel.com, guangli.li@intel.com, frank.du@intel.com, guobing.chen@intel.com, jiebin.sun@intel.com, Shuhua.Fan@intel.com, Matthew Auld , fan.zhao@intel.com, ying.huang@intel.com, shan.kang@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@intel.com, Wenhuan.Huang@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, lkp@lists.01.org, ming.a.chen@intel.com, yu.ma@intel.com, jessica.ji@intel.com, dapeng1.mi@intel.com, wangyang.guo@intel.com, LKML , gengxin.xie@intel.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 11/27/2020 5:34 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Xing Zhengjun (2020-11-26 01:44:55) >> >> >> On 11/25/2020 4:47 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: >>> Quoting Oliver Sang (2020-11-19 07:20:18) >>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:27:13PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Could you add intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org into reports going >>>>> forward. >>>>> >>>>> Quoting kernel test robot (2020-11-11 17:58:11) >>>>>> >>>>>> Greeting, >>>>>> >>>>>> FYI, we noticed a -54.0% regression of phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second due to commit: >>>>> >>>>> How many runs are there on the bad version to ensure the bisect is >>>>> repeatable? >>>> >>>> test 4 times. >>>> zxing@inn:/result/phoronix-test-suite/performance-true-Radial_Gradient_Paint-1024x1024-jxrendermark-1.2.4-ucode=0xd6-monitor=da39a3ee/lkp-cfl-d1/debian-x86_64-phoronix/x86_64-rhel-8.3/gcc-9/59dd13ad310793757e34afa489dd6fc8544fc3da$ grep -r "operations_per_second" */stats.json >>>> 0/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4133.487932, >>>> 1/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4120.421503, >>>> 2/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4188.414835, >>>> 3/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4068.549514, >>> >>> a w/o revert (drm-tip) >>> b w/ revert >>> +mB----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ >>> | ..b | >>> | ..b.aa | >>> | ....a.a | >>> | ....a.a | >>> | b b ........a | >>> | b b b b......... a | >>> | b bb bbb........... | >>> |b ab bbab.bb.b............ba b a a ab a| >>> | |__A__| | >>> | |MA_| | >>> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ >>> N Min Max Median Avg Stddev >>> a 120 3621.8761 7356.4442 4606.7895 4607.9132 156.17693 >>> b 120 2664.0563 6359.9686 4519.5036 4534.4463 95.471121 >>> >>> The patch is not expected to have any impact on the machine you are testing on. >>> -Chris >>> >> >> What's your code base? >> For my side: >> 1) sync the code to the head of Linux mainline >> 2) git reset --hard 59dd13ad31 >> 3) git revert 59dd13ad3107 >> We compare the test result of commit 59dd13ad3107 (step 2) and >> 2052847b06f8 (step 3, revert 59dd13ad3107), the regression should >> related with 59dd13ad3107. Each test case we run 5 times. > > a 59dd13ad31 > b revert > +mB----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | a | > | aa | > | .b....ba | > | .b....baa b | > | .........b . b b | > | a b.......... ..bb b b | > | b a b.............b.a b b | > |a a b. .aaa..b.............b..b....ab b a .| > | |__A__| | > | |___A_____| | > +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > N Min Max Median Avg Stddev > a 120 3658.3435 6363.7812 4527.4406 4536.612 86.095459 > b 120 3928.9643 6375.829 4576.0482 4585.4224 157.284 > Could you share with me your test commands and the hardware info, then I can reproduce it on my side? Thanks. -- Zhengjun Xing _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx