intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/psr: Compute Panel Replay/Adaptive coexistence behavior
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 13:24:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9c8d02a1567e58c53a4bce33b941a0e1b4b9975@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251121111655.164830-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com>

On Fri, 21 Nov 2025, Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> wrote:
> Currently we are checking Panel Replay capability DPCD register in
> intel_alpm.c and writing PR_ALPM_CTL_ALLOW_LINK_OFF_BETWEEN_AS_SDP_AND_SU
> and PR_ALPM_CTL_AS_SDP_TRANSMISSION_IN_ACTIVE_DISABLE in PR_ALPM_CTL
> register base on the informaion. Instead of directly accessing
> intel_dp->pr_dpcd compute the behavior during psr_compute_config and store
> it in intel_crtc_state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c     |  6 ++---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      | 22 +++++++++++++++----
>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> index 6372f533f65b5..7ce8c674bb030 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> @@ -326,11 +326,9 @@ static void lnl_alpm_configure(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		if (intel_dp->as_sdp_supported) {
>  			u32 pr_alpm_ctl = PR_ALPM_CTL_ADAPTIVE_SYNC_SDP_POSITION_T1;
>  
> -			if (intel_dp->pr_dpcd[INTEL_PR_DPCD_INDEX(DP_PANEL_REPLAY_CAP_CAPABILITY)] &
> -			    DP_PANEL_REPLAY_LINK_OFF_SUPPORTED_IN_PR_AFTER_ADAPTIVE_SYNC_SDP)
> +			if (crtc_state->link_off_after_as_sdp_when_pr_active)
>  				pr_alpm_ctl |= PR_ALPM_CTL_ALLOW_LINK_OFF_BETWEEN_AS_SDP_AND_SU;
> -			if (!(intel_dp->pr_dpcd[INTEL_PR_DPCD_INDEX(DP_PANEL_REPLAY_CAP_CAPABILITY)] &
> -						DP_PANEL_REPLAY_ASYNC_VIDEO_TIMING_NOT_SUPPORTED_IN_PR))
> +			if (crtc_state->disable_as_sdp_when_pr_active)
>  				pr_alpm_ctl |= PR_ALPM_CTL_AS_SDP_TRANSMISSION_IN_ACTIVE_DISABLE;
>  
>  			intel_de_write(display, PR_ALPM_CTL(display, cpu_transcoder),
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index f39d62aa99246..d8a222689a35b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -1161,6 +1161,8 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
>  	bool enable_psr2_su_region_et;
>  	bool req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline;
>  	bool has_panel_replay;
> +	bool link_off_after_as_sdp_when_pr_active;
> +	bool disable_as_sdp_when_pr_active;
>  	bool wm_level_disabled;
>  	bool pkg_c_latency_used;

Side note, we really *really* should start adding more (anonymous)
sub-structs in intel_crtc_state to group things. This has gotten out of
hands.

>  	/* Only used for state verification. */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 4c5883bed612b..9d2ba39423826 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1715,10 +1715,21 @@ static bool _psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -static bool
> -_panel_replay_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> -			     struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> -			     const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
> +static bool compute_link_off_after_as_sdp_when_pr_active(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> +	return (intel_dp->pr_dpcd[INTEL_PR_DPCD_INDEX(DP_PANEL_REPLAY_CAP_CAPABILITY)] &
> +		DP_PANEL_REPLAY_LINK_OFF_SUPPORTED_IN_PR_AFTER_ADAPTIVE_SYNC_SDP);
> +}
> +
> +static bool compute_disable_as_sdp_when_pr_active(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> +	return !(intel_dp->pr_dpcd[INTEL_PR_DPCD_INDEX(DP_PANEL_REPLAY_CAP_CAPABILITY)] &
> +		 DP_PANEL_REPLAY_ASYNC_VIDEO_TIMING_NOT_SUPPORTED_IN_PR);
> +}
> +
> +static bool _panel_replay_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +					 struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> +					 const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
>  {
>  	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
>  	struct intel_connector *connector =
> @@ -1747,6 +1758,9 @@ _panel_replay_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		return false;
>  	}
>  
> +	crtc_state->link_off_after_as_sdp_when_pr_active = compute_link_off_after_as_sdp_when_pr_active(intel_dp);
> +	crtc_state->disable_as_sdp_when_pr_active = compute_disable_as_sdp_when_pr_active(intel_dp);
> +
>  	if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
>  		return true;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-21 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-21 11:16 [PATCH 0/8] Move PSR/Panel Replay sink data into intel_connector Jouni Högander
2025-11-21 11:16 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/psr: Add panel granularity information " Jouni Högander
2025-12-01  9:54   ` Imre Deak
2025-11-21 11:16 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/psr: Use SU granularity information available in intel_connector Jouni Högander
2025-12-01 10:14   ` Imre Deak
2025-11-21 11:16 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/psr: Compute Panel Replay/Adaptive coexistence behavior Jouni Högander
2025-11-21 11:24   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-12-01 10:28   ` Imre Deak
2025-11-21 11:16 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/psr: Move pr_dpcd and psr_dpcd to intel_connector Jouni Högander
2025-12-01 10:45   ` Imre Deak
2025-11-21 11:16 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/psr: Clear pr_dpcd as well on disconnect Jouni Högander
2025-12-01 10:53   ` Imre Deak
2025-12-01 11:23     ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-12-03 14:37       ` Imre Deak
2025-12-03 15:10         ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-21 11:16 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/psr: Move Panel Replay DSC sink support data to intel_connector Jouni Högander
2025-12-01 10:55   ` Imre Deak
2025-11-21 11:16 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/psr: Move sink PSR and Panel Replay booleans " Jouni Högander
2025-12-01 10:59   ` Imre Deak
2025-11-21 11:16 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/psr: Move sink_sync_latency " Jouni Högander
2025-12-01 11:03   ` Imre Deak
2025-11-24 20:41 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Move PSR/Panel Replay sink data into intel_connector Patchwork
2025-11-25  1:09 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e9c8d02a1567e58c53a4bce33b941a0e1b4b9975@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).