Re: [PATCH v10 0/7] User readable error codes on atomic_ioctl failure

[Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, 24 Feb 2026, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Although I kinda doubt its actual usefulness to drive useful
> fallback logic because often the restrictions might be a combination
> of many things, and the kernel can only realistically report one of
> those things.

Yeah, this is my main concern as well. The drivers will have to bail out
on the first issue they hit, whatever it is. The drivers may choose to
do the checks in different orders, resulting in different failure modes
for different drivers. And finally, accidentally making the order of the
checks part of the ABI contract is a scary prospect. Imagine user space
depending on certain checks happening first in order for the fallback
logic to work properly. Is it a kernel regression to change the order of
the checks then?

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel