From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
To: Jan-Marek Glogowski <glogow@fbihome.de>,
Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v3 drm/i915: Re-apply "Perform link quality check, unconditionally during long pulse"
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 16:33:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1da4668ee68a4530b3607dd317cc2b49e3c3871.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <779aa206-85f2-63cc-3a73-f8a755f82ef2@fbihome.de>
On Fri, 2018-08-17 at 13:12 +0200, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote:
> Resend, as this was in my sent-mail folder, but it doesn't appear in the list
> archive…
>
> Am August 16, 2018 6:03:50 PM UTC schrieb Manasi Navare <
> manasi.d.navare@intel.com>:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 10:53:35AM +0200, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote:
> > > This re-applies the workaround for "some DP sinks, [which] are a
> > > little nuts" from commit 1a36147bb939 ("drm/i915: Perform link
> > > quality check unconditionally during long pulse").
> > > It makes the secondary AOC E2460P monitor connected via DP to an
> > > acer Veriton N4640G usable again.
> >
> > Would be nice to add in the commit message that this sink sends a
> > long pulse to indicate link loss, hence check link status during long
> > pulse.
>
> I have no idea, if this is happening. I just found the monitor wasn't working
> with the current
> kernel, when I was trying to debug an other bug I ran into while backporting
> DRM 4.15 to 4.4. I did
> a bisect while at it. Please read the FDO bug for more info.
I think you misunderstood-I believe mdnavare was asking if you could put the
comment that was on 1a36147bb939 originally in your patch
>
> > If there is a FDO bug associated with this you could also add the
> > Bugzilla link before Sign off tag.
> > But other than that this looks good to me.
>
> FDO bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107446
>
> Jan-Marek
>
> >
> > Manasi
> >
> > >
> > > This hunk was dropped in commit c85d200e8321 ("drm/i915: Move SST
> > > DP link retraining into the ->post_hotplug() hook")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan-Marek Glogowski <glogow@fbihome.de>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 33
> >
> > +++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > index 8e0e14b..22b2452 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -4333,18 +4333,6 @@ intel_dp_needs_link_retrain(struct intel_dp
> >
> > *intel_dp)
> > > return !drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(link_status, intel_dp->lane_count);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -/*
> > > - * If display is now connected check links status,
> > > - * there has been known issues of link loss triggering
> > > - * long pulse.
> > > - *
> > > - * Some sinks (eg. ASUS PB287Q) seem to perform some
> > > - * weird HPD ping pong during modesets. So we can apparently
> > > - * end up with HPD going low during a modeset, and then
> > > - * going back up soon after. And once that happens we must
> > > - * retrain the link to get a picture. That's in case no
> > > - * userspace component reacted to intermittent HPD dip.
> > > - */
> > > int intel_dp_retrain_link(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > > struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> > > {
> > > @@ -4923,7 +4911,8 @@ intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int
> > > -intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *connector)
> > > +intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *connector,
> > > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> > > {
> > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
> > > struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(&connector->base);
> > > @@ -4982,6 +4971,22 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector
> >
> > *connector)
> > > */
> > > status = connector_status_disconnected;
> > > goto out;
> > > + } else {
> > > + /*
> > > + * If display is now connected check links status,
> > > + * there has been known issues of link loss triggering
> > > + * long pulse.
> > > + *
> > > + * Some sinks (eg. ASUS PB287Q) seem to perform some
> > > + * weird HPD ping pong during modesets. So we can apparently
> > > + * end up with HPD going low during a modeset, and then
> > > + * going back up soon after. And once that happens we must
> > > + * retrain the link to get a picture. That's in case no
> > > + * userspace component reacted to intermittent HPD dip.
> > > + */
> > > + struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
> > > +
> > > + intel_dp_retrain_link(encoder, ctx);
> > > }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -5043,7 +5048,7 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector
> >
> > *connector,
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - status = intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector);
> > > + status = intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector, ctx);
> > > }
> > >
> > > intel_dp->detect_done = false;
> > > --
> > > 2.1.4
> > >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-17 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-03 18:10 [PATCH] drm/i915: Re-apply "Perform link quality check, unconditionally during long pulse" Jan-Marek Glogowski
2018-08-04 1:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2018-08-06 10:25 ` [PATCH] v2 " Jan-Marek Glogowski
2018-08-07 19:33 ` Lyude Paul
2018-08-07 22:26 ` Jan-Marek Glogowski
2018-08-07 22:46 ` Lyude Paul
2018-08-08 8:53 ` [PATCH] v3 " Jan-Marek Glogowski
2018-08-13 16:35 ` Lyude Paul
2018-08-16 18:03 ` Manasi Navare
2018-08-16 19:12 ` Jan-Marek Glogowski
2018-08-17 11:12 ` Jan-Marek Glogowski
2018-08-17 20:33 ` Lyude Paul [this message]
2018-08-04 1:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2018-08-06 16:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Re-apply "Perform link quality check, unconditionally during long pulse" (rev2) Patchwork
2018-08-06 19:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-08-08 23:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Re-apply "Perform link quality check, unconditionally during long pulse" (rev3) Patchwork
2018-08-09 2:39 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f1da4668ee68a4530b3607dd317cc2b49e3c3871.camel@redhat.com \
--to=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=glogow@fbihome.de \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).