From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3F88C433F5 for ; Thu, 26 May 2022 08:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5157E10ED44; Thu, 26 May 2022 08:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4903110E59E for ; Thu, 26 May 2022 08:39:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1653554396; x=1685090396; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=19apU3dwNsX83/1kK5Il34LNMsq2Umgm+6W8aO06xfQ=; b=NLlcTLhHN5EasLdnmcQThN1dhrMp90cJOacXvnUHXqLXsgtY+/aKz8LZ D7cNJo5Yof0KCrRDpCkXnm38KgwEhB3sGyNKRu5TDW59xn2OIp88oEeHK paHfWf9222etQRZsdaqmqxp/27RVhZQyWPrYRl2TEo9AS0MvW+lb0rk2p VqpClPd2PLizkMFBA9p3HsDAiNX8+IC2TOUg/YpEXWkQ9+fFP74rY0pXe 3tpTUA7YyQfjmtJyRK/vbJtl8Gd0W9VDwSqCWHvfcLnYPm0bYYvEwnZQ0 Tjiqav6UWz8gplErC2rq7w9jFIR1RsPddg6XdkXYpbyfS6AciB5ayjjDC A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10358"; a="334725772" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,252,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="334725772" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 May 2022 01:39:55 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,252,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="664836050" Received: from tkinch-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.214.182]) ([10.213.214.182]) by fmsmga003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 May 2022 01:39:54 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 09:39:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Content-Language: en-US To: "Dixit, Ashutosh" References: <877d6ahvkd.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> <87v8ts7lw4.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: Tvrtko Ursulin Organization: Intel Corporation UK Plc In-Reply-To: <87v8ts7lw4.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 0/7] drm/i915: Media freq factor and per-gt enhancements/fixes X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 26/05/2022 09:12, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: > On Wed, 25 May 2022 01:21:06 -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: >> >> On Mon, 23 May 2022 01:57:51 -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >>> >>> On 13/05/2022 02:36, Ashutosh Dixit wrote: >>>> Some recent Intel dGfx platforms allow media IP to work at a different >>>> frequency from the base GT. This patch series exposes sysfs controls for >>>> this functionality in the new per-gt sysfs. Some enhancements and fixes to >>>> previous per-gt functionality are also included to complete the new >>>> functionality: >>>> * Patches 1 and 2 implement basic sysfs controls for media freq >>>> * Patch 3 extends previous pcode functions for multiple gt's >>>> * Patch 4 inits pcode on different gt's >>>> * Patch 5 adds a couple of pcode helpers >>>> * Patch 6 uses the new pcode functions to retrieve media RP0/RPn freq >>>> * Patch 7 fixes memory leaks in the previous per-gt sysfs implementation >>>> and some code refactoring >>> >>> Patches 1, 3 and 5 have been merged to drm-intel-next, and then branch >>> cross-merged into drm-intel-gt-next. >>> >>> You can try re-sending the rest of the series now and see if that goes >>> smoothly. >> >> I sent the patches out Mon but am struggling to get a satisfactory CI run >> from what it looks like are CI issues (CI runs were fine on previous >> versions). Will update after we have successful CI. Thanks. > > Hi Tvrtko, > > We now have CI results. They look good to me (except that there is a false > positive). In case you think this is good enough to merge these patches > now: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102665/#rev10 Pushed, with no conflicts even! :) Regards, Tvrtko