On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 13:03:29 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:

> Sneaky putting this bug fix into this patch. :)

Ickle already saw that, and I've split it out into a separate patch. I
don't think this is necessary, but it seems like a sensible change.

> Don't you love the training state machine?  I think this looks ok, and
> the DP compliance test should catch any grievous errors, so aside from
> the bug fix hunk which should be split out:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

And that chunk has already been split out :-)

-- 
keith.packard@intel.com