From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915: Move the tracking of
	dpms_mode down into crtc enable/disable
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 14:20:27 -0700
Message-ID: <yunfwou17tw.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
References: <1303420712-6369-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<1303420712-6369-9-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<yunoc3i1dv5.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
	<849307$cqkkio@azsmga001.ch.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2096402802=="
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from keithp.com (home.keithp.com [63.227.221.253])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ACD9EAFB
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Wed,  4 May 2011 14:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <849307$cqkkio@azsmga001.ch.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

--===============2096402802==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 04 May 2011 20:40:37 +0100, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>=
 wrote:

> We can remove dpms_mode in favour of solely using active.

That sounds like a good plan.

And what about the intel_dp->dpms_mode value? Should it be switched to a
simple 'active' boolean as well? Or is the existing crtc->active value
sufficient?

=2D-=20
keith.packard@intel.com

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFNwcMbQp8BWwlsTdMRAv80AKDI+50CnVQJ4eFMG3Kmj7+qOb+7MACeOblh
Dbigi2hZv8GMDa1HKS9CGPs=
=/IF+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

--===============2096402802==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--===============2096402802==--