From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Attach a fb to the
	load-detect pipe
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:43:38 -0700
Message-ID: <yunhb9shig5.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
References: <1303291342-27668-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<1303291342-27668-7-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2102848118=="
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from keithp.com (home.keithp.com [63.227.221.253])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2319E74C
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1303291342-27668-7-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

--===============2102848118==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:22:22 +0100, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>=
 wrote:

> For bonus amusement value, we perform the first load detect before even
> establishing our fbdev.

It seems like we need to be able to perform load detection in this
case to create a suitable frame buffer at boot time.

I also don't see a check to ensure that the fbdev frame buffer is large
enough to cover the load detect mode; of course, it probably is given
that the load detect mode is usually quite small, but...

Seems like we need to allocate a temporary object for load detect mode
setting in some cases.

=2D-=20
keith.packard@intel.com

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFNrylaQp8BWwlsTdMRAqNSAJ4rCLSdFRclYoKlm903LgZDtkc6agCfQ6Tm
rM8IRVk5epRvo1uZmd0V3ys=
=X6pk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

--===============2102848118==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--===============2102848118==--