From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Packard Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/21] drm/i915: Remove extra 300ms delay during eDP mode setting Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:28:09 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20110923085243.6e4b7b4c@jbarnes-x220> <1317344993-24945-1-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> <1317344993-24945-4-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> <20110930162728.GC2859@phenom.ffwll.local> <20110930175821.GN2859@phenom.ffwll.local> <20110930180959.GP2859@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110930180959.GP2859@phenom.ffwll.local> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Vetter , Dave Airlie , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, "Barnes, Jesse" List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:09:59 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On further strolling through bspec to review later patches I've noticed > that PCH_PP_ON_DELAYS and PCH_PP_OFF_DELAYS seem to have values for > power on->backlight on and backlight off->panel off delays. Maybe we > should use these? Yeah, I must have missed those. For backlight on, I think I'll make it asynchronous with a delayed work proc so that the rest of the boot/dpms process doesn't block behind turning the light on. =2D-=20 keith.packard@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFOhgo5Qp8BWwlsTdMRAtsrAKDZ63YyzZwvWFTZsAJ2h60TbrwsdACgwzSW KKUc5lSg4NwGWv5kFB02D5k= =zwU/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--