From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Sanitize the output registers
	after resume
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:26:36 -0700
Message-ID: <yunoc4bpeib.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
References: <1302628011-16640-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1135790347=="
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from keithp.com (home.keithp.com [63.227.221.253])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546C39E885
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1302628011-16640-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: stable@kernel.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

--===============1135790347==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:06:51 +0100, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>=
 wrote:

> This patch rearranges the code we already have to clear up the
> conflicting state upon init and calls it from reset (which is called
> after we have lost control of the hardware, i.e. along both the boot and
> resume paths) instead.

Note that intel_sanitize_modesetting does not do anything on PCH
hardware yet. Otherwise, this looks like a reasonable plan.

Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>

=2D-=20
keith.packard@intel.com

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFNpItNQp8BWwlsTdMRApZTAJ9E22PPXWqKcRBVFyJBXp0gizH6HACfdVum
D5YahTAaMzvmQyR1bmfEKD8=
=15Fi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

--===============1135790347==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--===============1135790347==--