From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:09:16 -0800 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] i40e: Fix i40e_print_features() VEB mode output In-Reply-To: <20151202.154800.1567031979226825020.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1449045535.3716.10.camel@perches.com> <1449050215.3224.29.camel@intel.com> <1449051149.3716.20.camel@perches.com> <20151202.154800.1567031979226825020.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: <1449090556.3716.61.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 15:48 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Joe Perches 02 Dec 2015 02:12:29 -0800 > > On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 01:56 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > >> On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 00:38 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > >> > Noticed-by: Sergei Shtylyov ? > >> Don't you mean Reported-by? ?I am not aware of Noticed-by as being a > >> recognized signature.? > > At least for the get_maintainer script, "-by:" is a signature > Is patchwork using the same regexp?? If not, for the time being don't > user non-standard tags, and furthermore please ask the patchwork folks > to use something similar to getmaintainer.pl It doesn't seem so. ????response_re = re.compile( ????????r'^(Tested|Reviewed|Acked|Signed-off|Nacked|Reported)-by: .*$', ????????re.M | re.I) patchwork also doesn't seem very forgiving of misformatted signatures. (btw: Junio Hamano seems to prefer calling them trailers) And patchwork doesn't seem to handle "cc: " markers either.