From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:44:09 -0700 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH-RFC] drivers: net: ethernet: intel: e1000e: fix ethtool autoneg off for fiber In-Reply-To: <56FC2A62.6040206@cisco.com> References: <1458943126-32258-1-git-send-email-danielwa@cisco.com> <56FC2A62.6040206@cisco.com> Message-ID: <1459367049.2903.7.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 12:34 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > So Intel maintainers (Jeff, Jesse, Shannon, Carolyn, Don, Bruce, and > John) > > I'm assuming no comments means this patch is acceptable , and I will? > resubmit it without the RFC. Is that acceptable ? I personally do not see an issue with the patch, go ahead and submit it as a non-RFC and I will make sure that the e1000e maintainer (Dima Ruinskly) reviews it. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: