Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 2/2] e1000e: Fix ptp time reset on network interruption
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:21:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460658069.28210.1.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160414150844.GA29391@hobbes.lan20.walshnetwork.net>

On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 11:08 -0400, Brian Walsh wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 03:11:45AM +0000, Brown, Aaron F wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces at lists.osuos
> > > l.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Brian Walsh
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 8:23 PM
> > > To: intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org
> > > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 2/2] e1000e: Fix ptp time
> > > reset on
> > > network interruption
> > > 
> > > Time is resetting on any interruption of network connectivity.
> > > This
> > > causes the clock to jump around by the leapsecond offset. It
> > > should
> > > only reset when the device is initialized.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Brian Walsh <brian@walsh.ws>
> > > ---
> > > ?drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 22 +++++++++++-----
> > > ------
> > > ?1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > This patch introduces a Call Trace and panic for me on a handful of
> > regression systems.??I am usually seeing this on the e1000e driver
> > load, but on one system when just under traffic stress.??It seems
> > to show up mostly on older hardware, the trace has been spotted on
> > a system with a 82573 LOM, another system with a pair of
> > 80003ES2LAN controller's and an add in 82572.??The following trace
> > is taken via a serial console from a system with an 82574L and
> > 82579L LOM on the board after the system had been running randomish
> > netperf traffic for an hour or so.??The trace on driver load is
> > similar to the first call trace of this series, but generally did
> > not recover enough to get the follow along messages:
> > 
> This patch seems to be causing issues on other systems. I am running
> it
> on about 30 units with all the same card. I also have linuxptp
> running
> at the same time.
> 
> Would there be some other way to address the problem that I am trying
> to fix with this patch?
> 
> Basically if the network connection between the device and the 1588
> clock is interrupted for a period of time the hardware clock was
> switching from being on TAI time to thinking that the time is now UTC
> time. This causes the system time to fluctuate by the leapsecond
> offset.
> 
> I was able to reproduce this problem with a 1588 clock source using
> ipv4
> udp by temporarily dropping udp traffic on ports 319 and 320 through
> iptables.
> 
> Moving the the clock reset to only in initialization fixed the
> problem
> for me.
> 
> Brian

Moving the clock reset to initialization seems like the correct
behavior to me.

Thanks,
Jake

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-14 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-16 22:44 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] e1000e: Fix ptp time reset on network interruption Brian Walsh
2016-04-13  3:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 1/2] e1000e: Cleanup consistency in ret_val variable usage Brian Walsh
2016-04-13  3:22   ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 2/2] e1000e: Fix ptp time reset on network interruption Brian Walsh
2016-04-14  3:11     ` Brown, Aaron F
2016-04-14 14:48       ` Fujinaka, Todd
2016-04-14 15:08       ` Brian Walsh
2016-04-14 18:21         ` Keller, Jacob E [this message]
2016-04-14 22:42           ` Brian Walsh
2016-04-14 23:25             ` Keller, Jacob E
2016-04-14 22:38     ` Keller, Jacob E
2016-04-14 23:00     ` Keller, Jacob E
2016-04-15  2:30     ` Jeff Kirsher
2016-04-14 12:46   ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 1/2] e1000e: Cleanup consistency in ret_val variable usage Avargil, Raanan
2016-04-15  1:44   ` Brown, Aaron F

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1460658069.28210.1.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox