From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 14:27:58 -0700 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches In-Reply-To: <20160518173605.2608.42484.stgit@localhost.localdomain> References: <20160518173605.2608.42484.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1463606878.2713.68.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:44 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > This patch series is meant to be applied after: > [PATCH v7 net-next 00/16] ipv6: Enable GUEoIPv6 and more fixes for v6 > tunneling > > The first patch addresses an issue we already resolved in the GREv4 and > is > now present in GREv6 with the introduction of FOU/GUE for IPv6 based GRE > tunnels. > > The second patch goes through and enables IPv6 tunnel offloads for the > Intel > NICs that already support the IPv4 based IP-in-IP tunnel offloads.? I > have > only done a bit of touch testing but have seen ~20 Gb/s over an i40e > interface using a v4-in-v6 tunnel, and I have verified IPv6 GRE is still > passing traffic at around the same rate.? I plan to do further testing > but > with these patches present it should enable a wider audience to be able > to > test the new features introduced in Tom's patchset with hardware > offloads. > > --- > > Alexander Duyck (2): > ????? ip6_gre: Do not allow segmentation offloads GRE_CSUM is enabled > with FOU/GUE > ????? intel: Add support for IPv6 IP-in-IP offload Dave, I have this series added to my queue. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: