From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 10:14:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464110072.2631.13.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160518.211043.773402183440053556.davem@davemloft.net>
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 21:10 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 14:27:58 -0700
>
> > On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:44 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> This patch series is meant to be applied after:
> >> [PATCH v7 net-next 00/16] ipv6: Enable GUEoIPv6 and more fixes for v6
> >> tunneling
> >>?
> >> The first patch addresses an issue we already resolved in the GREv4
> and
> >> is
> >> now present in GREv6 with the introduction of FOU/GUE for IPv6 based
> GRE
> >> tunnels.
> >>?
> >> The second patch goes through and enables IPv6 tunnel offloads for the
> >> Intel
> >> NICs that already support the IPv4 based IP-in-IP tunnel offloads.? I
> >> have
> >> only done a bit of touch testing but have seen ~20 Gb/s over an i40e
> >> interface using a v4-in-v6 tunnel, and I have verified IPv6 GRE is
> still
> >> passing traffic at around the same rate.? I plan to do further testing
> >> but
> >> with these patches present it should enable a wider audience to be
> able
> >> to
> >> test the new features introduced in Tom's patchset with hardware
> >> offloads.
> >>?
> >> ---
> >>?
> >> Alexander Duyck (2):
> >> ????? ip6_gre: Do not allow segmentation offloads GRE_CSUM is enabled
> >> with FOU/GUE
> >> ????? intel: Add support for IPv6 IP-in-IP offload
> >?
> > Dave, I have this series added to my queue.
>
> Why would you if it depends upon Tom's series, as mentioned above, which
> isn't even in my tree yet?
I was not able to apply his patches to my dev-queue due to conflicts and
from discussion with Alex, I made the mistake in assuming the issues I saw
was because it did not have Tom's driver changes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20160524/6d768bcc/attachment.asc>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-24 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-18 17:44 [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 17:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 1/2] ip6_gre: Do not allow segmentation offloads GRE_CSUM is enabled with FOU/GUE Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 17:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 2/2] intel: Add support for IPv6 IP-in-IP offload Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 21:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches Jeff Kirsher
2016-05-18 23:19 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 23:31 ` Jeff Kirsher
2016-05-19 4:10 ` David Miller
2016-05-24 17:14 ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2016-05-24 17:46 ` Alex Duyck
2016-05-20 23:26 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1464110072.2631.13.camel@intel.com \
--to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox