From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 1/1] e1000e: fix buffer overrun while the I219 is processing DMA transactions
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:20:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508944819.12406.2.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171025122318.5692-1-sasha.neftin@intel.com>
On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 15:23 +0300, Sasha Neftin wrote:
> Description: Intel? 100/200 Series Chipset platforms
> reduced the round-trip latency for the LAN Controller
> DMA accesses, causing in some high performance cases a buffer
> overrun while the I219 LAN Connected Device is processing
> the DMA transactions. I219LM and I219V devices can fall into
> unrecovered Tx hang under very stressfully UDP traffic and multiple
> reconnection of Ethernet cable. This Tx hang of the LAN Controller
> is only recovered if the system is rebooted. Slightly slow down
> DMA access by reducing the number of outstanding requests.
> This workaround could have an impact on TCP traffic performance
> on the platform. Disabling TSO eliminates performance loss for TCP
> traffic without a noticeable impact on CPU performance.
>
> Please, refer to I218/I219 specification update:
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/embedded/products/networking/
> ethernet-connection-i218-family-documentation.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander H Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dima Ruinskiy <dima.ruinskiy@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Raanan Avargil <raanan.avargil@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Sasha, you generated this patch against an old tree and many of these
changes are already upstream in Dave's net-next tree, so this patch
does not apply cleanly.
Please rebase your patch against my latest next-queue tree, dev-queue
branch and submit a v2 please.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20171025/2b3cdd73/attachment.asc>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-25 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-25 12:23 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 1/1] e1000e: fix buffer overrun while the I219 is processing DMA transactions Sasha Neftin
2017-10-25 15:20 ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-06 13:49 Sasha Neftin
2017-08-18 2:56 ` Brown, Aaron F
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1508944819.12406.2.camel@intel.com \
--to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox