From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William Dauchy Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:34:58 +0100 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] regression in ixgbe SFP detection patch In-Reply-To: <87618083B2453E4A8714035B62D67992504DF0AA@FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20151111173527.GA3641@gandi.net> <87618083B2453E4A8714035B62D67992504DF0AA@FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: <20151111213458.GD3641@gandi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On Nov11 20:33, Tantilov, Emil S wrote: > If the diff above is the patch you are referring to then you will break the > SFP+ detection in the case where the driver was loaded while there were no > SFP+ modules present in the cages. understood, I was surprised of the modification of behavior. -- William -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: not available URL: