From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:13:54 +0100
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v5 1/6] Timekeeping cross timestamp
 interface for device drivers
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLVY=u1S8qy0fox6Fmkkb8yDS3yHu+UioQe9-qNraM7ngQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1451911523-8534-1-git-send-email-christopher.s.hall@intel.com>
 <1451911523-8534-2-git-send-email-christopher.s.hall@intel.com>
 <CALAqxLXThwiibfoxEvWMZWMDTeFi2EqEU6i2tBvF5H89B3Pzxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <op.yav9khd91774gr@chall-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <CALAqxLVY=u1S8qy0fox6Fmkkb8yDS3yHu+UioQe9-qNraM7ngQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160108091354.GB2344@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
List-ID: <intel-wired-lan.osuosl.org>

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 05:05:24PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> Yea. I just feel like lots of structures add extra abstraction that
> makes the code harder to learn or re-learn. Not only is one trying to
> remember the base types that are being passed around, but you also
> have to remember what all the meta-structures are for. Especially for
> these two-value structures.

FWIW, I had exactly this trouble when reading this series.

Thanks,
Richard