From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:11:53 +0200
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH RFC V1 net-next 0/6] Time based packet
	transmission
In-Reply-To: <20170920173533.32537-1-levipearson@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1505719061.git.rcochran@linutronix.de>
 <20170920173533.32537-1-levipearson@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20170920201153.d3o3h62y2snuacef@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
List-ID: <intel-wired-lan.osuosl.org>

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:35:33AM -0600, levipearson at gmail.com wrote:
> Anyway, I am wholly in favor of this proposal--in fact, it is very similar to
> a patch set I shared with Eric Mann and others at Intel in early Dec 2016 with
> the intention to get some early feedback before submitting here. I never heard
> back and got busy with other things. I only mention this since you said
> elsewhere that you got this idea from Eric Mann yourself, and I am curious
> whether Eric and I came up with it independently (which I would not be
> surprised at).

Well, I actually thought of placing the Tx time in a CMSG all by
myself, but later I found Eric's talk from 2012,

  https://linuxplumbers.ubicast.tv/videos/linux-network-enabling-requirements-for-audiovideo-bridging-avb/

and so I wanted to give him credit.

Thanks,
Richard