From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 07:35:54 +0200 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 00/18] use ARRAY_SIZE macro In-Reply-To: <20171001205220.10b78086@blatinox-laptop.localdomain> References: <20171001193101.8898-1-jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr> <20171001220131.GA11812@eros> <20171001205220.10b78086@blatinox-laptop.localdomain> Message-ID: <20171002053554.GA28743@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 08:52:20PM -0400, J?r?my Lefaure wrote: > On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:01:31 +1100 > "Tobin C. Harding" wrote: > > > > In order to reduce the size of the To: and Cc: lines, each patch of the > > > series is sent only to the maintainers and lists concerned by the patch. > > > This cover letter is sent to every list concerned by this series. > > > > Why don't you just send individual patches for each subsystem? I'm not a maintainer but I don't see > > how any one person is going to be able to apply this whole series, it is making it hard for > > maintainers if they have to pick patches out from among the series (if indeed any will bother > > doing that). > Yeah, maybe it would have been better to send individual patches. > > From my point of view it's a series because the patches are related (I > did a git format-patch from my local branch). But for the maintainers > point of view, they are individual patches. And the maintainers view is what matters here, if you wish to get your patches reviewed and accepted... thanks, greg k-h