From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net 04/13] dp83640: reject unsupported external timestamp flags
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:44:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114184507.18937-5-richardcochran@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Fix the dp83640 PTP support to explicitly reject any future flags that
get added to the external timestamp request ioctl.
In order to maintain currently functioning code, this patch accepts all
three current flags. This is because the PTP_RISING_EDGE and
PTP_FALLING_EDGE flags have unclear semantics and each driver seems to
have interpreted them slightly differently.
For the record, the semantics of this driver are:
flags Meaning
---------------------------------------------------- --------------------------
PTP_ENABLE_FEATURE Time stamp rising edge
PTP_ENABLE_FEATURE|PTP_RISING_EDGE Time stamp rising edge
PTP_ENABLE_FEATURE|PTP_FALLING_EDGE Time stamp falling edge
PTP_ENABLE_FEATURE|PTP_RISING_EDGE|PTP_FALLING_EDGE Time stamp falling edge
Cc: Stefan S?rensen <stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
index 04ad77758920..2781b0e2d947 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
@@ -469,6 +469,11 @@ static int ptp_dp83640_enable(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
switch (rq->type) {
case PTP_CLK_REQ_EXTTS:
+ /* Reject requests with unsupported flags */
+ if (rq->extts.flags & ~(PTP_ENABLE_FEATURE |
+ PTP_RISING_EDGE |
+ PTP_FALLING_EDGE))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
index = rq->extts.index;
if (index >= N_EXT_TS)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.20.1
reply other threads:[~2019-11-14 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191114184507.18937-5-richardcochran@gmail.com \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox