Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 3/6] igc: Check __IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS instead of ptp_tx_skb
Date: Wed,  3 Jun 2020 17:01:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200604000105.15059-4-andre.guedes@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200604000105.15059-1-andre.guedes@intel.com>

The __IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS flag indicates we have a pending tx
timestamp. In some places, instead of checking that flag, we check
adapter->ptp_tx_skb. This patch fixes those places to use the flag.

Quick note about igc_ptp_tx_hwtstamp() change: when that function is
called, adapter->ptp_tx_skb is expected to be valid always so we
WARN_ON_ONCE() in case it is not.

Quick note about igc_ptp_suspend() change: when suspending, we don't
really need to check if there is a pending timestamp. We can simply
clear it unconditionally.

Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c | 16 +++++++---------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
index b1b23c6bf689..e65fdcf966b2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
@@ -404,9 +404,6 @@ void igc_ptp_tx_hang(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
 	bool timeout = time_is_before_jiffies(adapter->ptp_tx_start +
 					      IGC_PTP_TX_TIMEOUT);
 
-	if (!adapter->ptp_tx_skb)
-		return;
-
 	if (!test_bit(__IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &adapter->state))
 		return;
 
@@ -435,6 +432,9 @@ static void igc_ptp_tx_hwtstamp(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
 	struct igc_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
 	u64 regval;
 
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb))
+		return;
+
 	regval = rd32(IGC_TXSTMPL);
 	regval |= (u64)rd32(IGC_TXSTMPH) << 32;
 	igc_ptp_systim_to_hwtstamp(adapter, &shhwtstamps, regval);
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static void igc_ptp_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct igc_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
 	u32 tsynctxctl;
 
-	if (!adapter->ptp_tx_skb)
+	if (!test_bit(__IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &adapter->state))
 		return;
 
 	if (time_is_before_jiffies(adapter->ptp_tx_start +
@@ -588,11 +588,9 @@ void igc_ptp_suspend(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
 		return;
 
 	cancel_work_sync(&adapter->ptp_tx_work);
-	if (adapter->ptp_tx_skb) {
-		dev_kfree_skb_any(adapter->ptp_tx_skb);
-		adapter->ptp_tx_skb = NULL;
-		clear_bit_unlock(__IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &adapter->state);
-	}
+	dev_kfree_skb_any(adapter->ptp_tx_skb);
+	adapter->ptp_tx_skb = NULL;
+	clear_bit_unlock(__IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &adapter->state);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-04  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-04  0:00 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/6] igc: PTP timestamping fixes Andre Guedes
2020-06-04  0:01 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/6] igc: Clean up rx timestamping logic Andre Guedes
2020-06-18 17:18   ` Brown, Aaron F
2020-06-04  0:01 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/6] igc: Remove duplicate code in tx timestamp handling Andre Guedes
2020-06-18 17:18   ` Brown, Aaron F
2020-06-04  0:01 ` Andre Guedes [this message]
2020-06-18 17:18   ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 3/6] igc: Check __IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS instead of ptp_tx_skb Brown, Aaron F
2020-06-04  0:01 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 4/6] igc: Remove UDP filter setup in PTP code Andre Guedes
2020-06-18 17:19   ` Brown, Aaron F
2020-06-04  0:01 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 5/6] igc: Refactor igc_ptp_set_timestamp_mode() Andre Guedes
2020-06-18 17:19   ` Brown, Aaron F
2020-06-04  0:01 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 6/6] igc: Fix rx timestamp disabling Andre Guedes
2020-06-18 17:19   ` Brown, Aaron F

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200604000105.15059-4-andre.guedes@intel.com \
    --to=andre.guedes@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox