From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/isolation: API to get housekeeping online CPUs
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:09:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200924120956.GA19346@lenoir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200924084029.GC1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:40:29AM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 02:11:23PM -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote:
> > Introduce a new API hk_num_online_cpus(), that can be used to
> > retrieve the number of online housekeeping CPUs that are meant to handle
> > managed IRQ jobs.
> >
> > This API is introduced for the drivers that were previously relying only
> > on num_online_cpus() to determine the number of MSIX vectors to create.
> > In an RT environment with large isolated but fewer housekeeping CPUs this
> > was leading to a situation where an attempt to move all of the vectors
> > corresponding to isolated CPUs to housekeeping CPUs were failing due to
> > per CPU vector limit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/sched/isolation.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched/isolation.h b/include/linux/sched/isolation.h
> > index cc9f393e2a70..2e96b626e02e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched/isolation.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched/isolation.h
> > @@ -57,4 +57,17 @@ static inline bool housekeeping_cpu(int cpu, enum hk_flags flags)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline unsigned int hk_num_online_cpus(void)
>
> This breaks with the established naming of that header.
I guess we can make it housekeeping_num_online_cpus() ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-24 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-23 18:11 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 0/4] isolation: limit msix vectors based on housekeeping CPUs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-23 18:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/isolation: API to get housekeeping online CPUs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 8:40 ` peterz
2020-09-24 12:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2020-09-24 12:23 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-09-24 12:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-24 12:26 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-09-24 13:45 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 20:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 21:52 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-23 18:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 2/4] sched/isolation: Extend nohz_full to isolate managed IRQs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-23 18:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 3/4] i40e: limit msix vectors based on housekeeping CPUs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-23 18:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 4/4] PCI: Limit pci_alloc_irq_vectors as per " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 20:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 21:39 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 22:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 23:40 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200924120956.GA19346@lenoir \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox