From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 20:05:46 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201019230546.GH36674@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdkR_Ttfo7_JKUiZFVqr=Uh=4b05KCPCSuzwk=zaWtA2_Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:42:15PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 10:43 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote:
> > > From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> > > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
> > > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting
> > > early acks.
> >
> > Please break it up into one-patch-per-subsystem, like normal, and get it
> > merged that way.
> >
> > Sending us a patch, without even a diffstat to review, isn't going to
> > get you very far...
>
> Tom,
> If you're able to automate this cleanup, I suggest checking in a
> script that can be run on a directory. Then for each subsystem you
> can say in your commit "I ran scripts/fix_whatever.py on this subdir."
> Then others can help you drive the tree wide cleanup. Then we can
> enable -Wunreachable-code-break either by default, or W=2 right now
> might be a good idea.
I remember using clang-modernize in the past to fix issues very
similar to this, if clang machinery can generate the warning, can't
something like clang-tidy directly generate the patch?
You can send me a patch for drivers/infiniband/* as well
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-19 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-17 16:09 [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks trix
2020-10-17 16:24 ` Joe Perches
2020-10-17 18:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2020-10-17 19:00 ` Joe Perches
2020-10-17 21:01 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Dan Williams
2020-10-18 5:43 ` Greg KH
2020-10-18 14:04 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-19 19:42 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-10-19 23:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-10-20 14:09 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-20 8:47 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [Ocfs2-devel] " John Haxby
2020-10-20 13:55 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Tom Rix
2020-10-20 18:42 ` Joe Perches
2020-10-18 9:29 ` Hans de Goede
2020-10-18 18:59 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [Ocfs2-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-18 19:06 ` Joe Perches
2020-10-18 19:13 ` James Bottomley
2020-10-18 19:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-18 19:17 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201019230546.GH36674@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox