From: =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?= <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 4/9] xsk: check need wakeup flag in sendmsg()
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:34:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201028133437.212503-5-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201028133437.212503-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
From: Bj?rn T?pel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Add a check for need wake up in sendmsg(), so that if a user calls
sendmsg() when no wakeup is needed, do not trigger a wakeup.
To simplify the need wakeup check in the syscall, unconditionally
enable the need wakeup flag for Tx. This has a side-effect for poll();
If poll() is called for a socket without enabled need wakeup, a Tx
wakeup is unconditionally performed.
The wakeup matrix for AF_XDP now looks like:
need wakeup | poll() | sendmsg() | recvmsg()
------------+------------------------+---------------------+---------------------
disabled | wake Tx | wake Tx | nop
enabled | check flag; wake Tx/Rx | check flag; wake Tx | check flag; wake Rx
Signed-off-by: Bj?rn T?pel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
---
net/xdp/xsk.c | 6 +++++-
net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c | 13 ++++++-------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
index 17d51d1a5752..2e5b9f27c7a3 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
@@ -465,13 +465,17 @@ static int xsk_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len)
bool need_wait = !(m->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
struct xdp_sock *xs = xdp_sk(sk);
+ struct xsk_buff_pool *pool;
if (unlikely(!xsk_is_bound(xs)))
return -ENXIO;
if (unlikely(need_wait))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- return __xsk_sendmsg(sk);
+ pool = xs->pool;
+ if (pool->cached_need_wakeup & XDP_WAKEUP_TX)
+ return __xsk_sendmsg(sk);
+ return 0;
}
static int xsk_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t len, int flags)
diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
index 64c9e55d4d4e..a4acb5e9576f 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
@@ -144,14 +144,13 @@ static int __xp_assign_dev(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
if (err)
return err;
- if (flags & XDP_USE_NEED_WAKEUP) {
+ if (flags & XDP_USE_NEED_WAKEUP)
pool->uses_need_wakeup = true;
- /* Tx needs to be explicitly woken up the first time.
- * Also for supporting drivers that do not implement this
- * feature. They will always have to call sendto().
- */
- pool->cached_need_wakeup = XDP_WAKEUP_TX;
- }
+ /* Tx needs to be explicitly woken up the first time. Also
+ * for supporting drivers that do not implement this
+ * feature. They will always have to call sendto() or poll().
+ */
+ pool->cached_need_wakeup = XDP_WAKEUP_TX;
dev_hold(netdev);
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-28 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-28 13:34 [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/9] Introduce biased busy-polling =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-10-28 13:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/9] net: introduce " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-10-28 13:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/9] net: add SO_BUSY_POLL_BUDGET socket option =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-10-28 13:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 3/9] xsk: add support for recvmsg() =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-10-28 13:34 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?= [this message]
2020-10-28 13:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 5/9] xsk: add busy-poll support for {recv, send}msg() =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-10-28 13:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 6/9] xsk: propagate napi_id to XDP socket Rx path =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-10-28 13:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 7/9] samples/bpf: use recvfrom() in xdpsock =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-10-28 13:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 8/9] samples/bpf: add busy-poll support to xdpsock =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-10-28 13:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 9/9] samples/bpf: add option to set the busy-poll budget =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-10-28 14:13 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/9] Introduce biased busy-polling Eric Dumazet
2020-10-28 15:14 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201028133437.212503-5-bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
--to=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox