From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 1/9] igc: Fix igc_ptp_rx_pktstamp()
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 18:56:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201102175617.GI6427@ranger.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201030210351.46482-2-andre.guedes@intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 02:03:43PM -0700, Andre Guedes wrote:
> The comment describing the timestamps layout in the packet buffer is
> wrong and the code is actually retrieving the timestamp in Timer 1
> reference instead of Timer 0. This hasn't been a big issue so far
> because hardware is configured to report both timestamps using Timer 0
> (see IGC_SRRCTL register configuration in igc_ptp_enable_rx_timestamp()
> helper). This patch fixes the comment and the code so we retrieve the
> timestamp in Timer 0 reference as expected.
>
> This patch also takes the opportunity to get rid of the hw.mac.type check
> since it is not required.
>
> Fixes: 81b055205e8ba ("igc: Add support for RX timestamping")
> Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c | 72 +++++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
> index 83d59b08e883..b66dda992d32 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
> @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ void igc_ptp_init(struct igc_adapter *adapter);
> void igc_ptp_reset(struct igc_adapter *adapter);
> void igc_ptp_suspend(struct igc_adapter *adapter);
> void igc_ptp_stop(struct igc_adapter *adapter);
> -void igc_ptp_rx_pktstamp(struct igc_q_vector *q_vector, void *va,
> +void igc_ptp_rx_pktstamp(struct igc_q_vector *q_vector, u32 *va,
> struct sk_buff *skb);
> int igc_ptp_set_ts_config(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr);
> int igc_ptp_get_ts_config(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
> index d73c4aaac610..79873f6df335 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
> @@ -154,46 +154,54 @@ static void igc_ptp_systim_to_hwtstamp(struct igc_adapter *adapter,
> }
>
> /**
> - * igc_ptp_rx_pktstamp - retrieve Rx per packet timestamp
> + * igc_ptp_rx_pktstamp - Retrieve timestamp from rx packet buffer
> * @q_vector: Pointer to interrupt specific structure
> * @va: Pointer to address containing Rx buffer
> * @skb: Buffer containing timestamp and packet
> *
> - * This function is meant to retrieve the first timestamp from the
> - * first buffer of an incoming frame. The value is stored in little
> - * endian format starting on byte 0. There's a second timestamp
> - * starting on byte 8.
> - **/
> -void igc_ptp_rx_pktstamp(struct igc_q_vector *q_vector, void *va,
> + * This function retrieves the timestamp saved in the beginning of packet
> + * buffer. While two timestamps are available, one in timer0 reference and the
> + * other in timer1 reference, this function considers only the timestamp in
> + * timer0 reference.
> + */
> +void igc_ptp_rx_pktstamp(struct igc_q_vector *q_vector, u32 *va,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct igc_adapter *adapter = q_vector->adapter;
> - __le64 *regval = (__le64 *)va;
> - int adjust = 0;
> -
> - /* The timestamp is recorded in little endian format.
> - * DWORD: | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3
> - * Field: | Timer0 Low | Timer0 High | Timer1 Low | Timer1 High
> + u64 regval;
> + int adjust;
> +
> + /* Timestamps are saved in little endian at the beginning of the packet
> + * buffer following the layout:
> + *
> + * | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Minor nit, I find DWORD comment helpful from previous version of this
description.
> + * | Timer1 SYSTIML | Timer1 SYSTIMH | Timer0 SYSTIML | Timer0 SYSTIMH |
A dumb question from ptp/igc noob: why two timers?
> + *
> + * SYSTIML holds the nanoseconds part while SYSTIMH holds the seconds
> + * part of the timestamp.
> */
> - igc_ptp_systim_to_hwtstamp(adapter, skb_hwtstamps(skb),
> - le64_to_cpu(regval[0]));
> -
> - /* adjust timestamp for the RX latency based on link speed */
> - if (adapter->hw.mac.type == igc_i225) {
if this check is not required here, then is it within
igc_ptp_systim_to_hwtstamp?
> - switch (adapter->link_speed) {
> - case SPEED_10:
> - adjust = IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_10;
> - break;
> - case SPEED_100:
> - adjust = IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_100;
> - break;
> - case SPEED_1000:
> - adjust = IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_1000;
> - break;
> - case SPEED_2500:
> - adjust = IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_2500;
> - break;
> - }
> + regval = le32_to_cpu(va[2]);
> + regval |= (u64)le32_to_cpu(va[3]) << 32;
> + igc_ptp_systim_to_hwtstamp(adapter, skb_hwtstamps(skb), regval);
> +
> + /* Adjust timestamp for the RX latency based on link speed */
> + switch (adapter->link_speed) {
> + case SPEED_10:
> + adjust = IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_10;
> + break;
> + case SPEED_100:
> + adjust = IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_100;
> + break;
> + case SPEED_1000:
> + adjust = IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_1000;
> + break;
> + case SPEED_2500:
> + adjust = IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_2500;
> + break;
> + default:
> + adjust = 0;
> + netdev_warn_once(adapter->netdev, "Imprecise timestamp\n");
How is timestamp related to link speed? I mean, this warning is telling me
that there is something wrong with the timestamp that hw put onto frame,
not that link speed is cranky.
> + break;
> }
> skb_hwtstamps(skb)->hwtstamp =
> ktime_sub_ns(skb_hwtstamps(skb)->hwtstamp, adjust);
> --
> 2.28.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-wired-lan mailing list
> Intel-wired-lan at osuosl.org
> https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-02 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-30 21:03 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 0/9] igc: Add XDP support Andre Guedes
2020-10-30 21:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 1/9] igc: Fix igc_ptp_rx_pktstamp() Andre Guedes
2020-11-02 17:56 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2020-11-03 23:39 ` Andre Guedes
2020-11-04 22:26 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-11-06 1:01 ` Guedes, Andre
2020-10-30 21:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 2/9] igc: Remove unused argument from igc_tx_cmd_type() Andre Guedes
2020-10-30 21:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 3/9] igc: Introduce igc_rx_buffer_flip() helper Andre Guedes
2020-10-30 21:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 4/9] igc: Introduce igc_get_rx_frame_truesize() helper Andre Guedes
2020-10-30 21:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 5/9] igc: Refactor rx timestamp handling Andre Guedes
2020-10-30 21:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 6/9] igc: Add set/clear large buffer helpers Andre Guedes
2020-10-30 21:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 7/9] igc: Add initial XDP support Andre Guedes
2020-11-02 18:07 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-11-03 23:40 ` Andre Guedes
2020-11-04 21:56 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-10-30 21:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 8/9] igc: Add support for XDP_TX action Andre Guedes
2020-11-02 18:26 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-11-03 23:40 ` Andre Guedes
2020-11-05 22:03 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-10-30 21:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 9/9] igc: Add support for XDP_REDIRECT action Andre Guedes
2020-11-02 18:30 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-11-03 23:41 ` Andre Guedes
2020-11-02 18:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 0/9] igc: Add XDP support Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-11-03 23:41 ` Andre Guedes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201102175617.GI6427@ranger.igk.intel.com \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox