From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C4E1C433EF for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA0A83224; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:28:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NBqVtAjv_tyN; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E75D83DFC; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C001BF300 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40A941734 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:28:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 323eax4ALQTm for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:28:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0D31410B4 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2FFAB820CC; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 017E1C3411E; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:28:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1655314087; bh=NGsPa22nNEnE5x5vS8yssNlYfYxkSRU3+UAJVehVMag=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UiR3VvUJ39a+BVuIQoT3c+3dtQ/zKJLQT2LfcTYRqtvX68wX0kE3cNoGHW3Wx8mq5 ekxzcWi/PdCSeLBai+XbqoWqwki3dCDMn6E/YQzZRdVQP4X2u278m2XUzoafRt/QG4 6BDn/HLl+9f+D61T5p7BlpMtqaK1gKZgbKe9hCCyYC1cvLe9y9XCG7jVfGEWebb/Xk YXHq+ggIgpGCa/IWZKb6te4iWZL4ecm4NgZV2XVq0IgiU+JBC9iiB82qRYUZRsvqbI ihMGNUx/XpiorzvatHyo2ztg/xX2iv4iRN1G192Uv5ml7qtkaXiRUQos3cXHf/F2/h 8m13vAmKFo2NA== Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:28:06 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Arnd Bergmann Message-ID: <20220615102806.1224d227@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <202206091828.eNkyL2EI-lkp@intel.com> <20220615085128.026f1c56@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_adminq_cmd.h:1174:29: error: enumerator value for 'i40e_static_assert_i40e_aqc_cloud_filters_element_data' is not an integer constant X-BeenThere: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Wired Ethernet Linux Kernel Driver Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Russell King - ARM Linux , Eric Dumazet , Intel Wired LAN , Paolo Abeni , "David S. Miller" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org Sender: "Intel-wired-lan" On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:56:24 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:51 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > > On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 16:11:17 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > The bug is that 'i40e_aqc_cloud_filters_element_data' and some other > > > structures in the > > > same file are broken when building an ARM kernel without CONFIG_AEABI, which has > > > unusual struct packing rules and triggers the static assertion. > > > > What are those packing rules, out of curiosity? > > On the old OABI, each struct member is on a 32-bit boundary. Oh. GTK! _______________________________________________ Intel-wired-lan mailing list Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan