Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, kurt@linutronix.de, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v3 4/4] igc: Add workaround for missing timestamps
Date: Mon,  5 Jun 2023 18:33:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230606013325.602823-5-vinicius.gomes@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230606013325.602823-1-vinicius.gomes@intel.com>

There's an hardware issue that can cause missing timestamps. The bug
is that the interrupt is only cleared if the IGC_TXSTMPH_0 register is
read.

The bug can cause a race condition if a timestamp is captured at the
wrong time, and we will miss that timestamp. To reduce the time window
that the problem is able to happen, in case no timestamp was ready, we
read the "previous" value of the timestamp registers, and we compare
with the "current" one, if it didn't change we can reasonably sure
that no timestamp was captured. If they are different, we use the new
value as the captured timestamp.

This workaround has more impact when multiple timestamp registers are
used, and the IGC_TXSTMPH_0 register always need to be read, so the
interrupt is cleared.

Fixes: 2c344ae24501 ("igc: Add support for TX timestamping")
Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
index cf963a12a92f..32ef112f8291 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
@@ -685,14 +685,49 @@ static void igc_ptp_tx_hwtstamp(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
 	struct sk_buff *skb = adapter->ptp_tx_skb;
 	struct skb_shared_hwtstamps shhwtstamps;
 	struct igc_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
+	u32 tsynctxctl;
 	int adjust = 0;
 	u64 regval;
 
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb))
 		return;
 
-	regval = rd32(IGC_TXSTMPL);
-	regval |= (u64)rd32(IGC_TXSTMPH) << 32;
+	tsynctxctl = rd32(IGC_TSYNCTXCTL);
+	tsynctxctl &= IGC_TSYNCTXCTL_TXTT_0;
+	if (tsynctxctl) {
+		regval = rd32(IGC_TXSTMPL);
+		regval |= (u64)rd32(IGC_TXSTMPH) << 32;
+	} else {
+		/* There's a bug in the hardware that could cause
+		 * missing interrupts for TX timestamping. The issue
+		 * is that for new interrupts to be triggered, the
+		 * IGC_TXSTMPH_0 register must be read.
+		 *
+		 * To avoid discarding a valid timestamp that just
+		 * happened at the "wrong" time, we need to confirm
+		 * that there was no timestamp captured, we do that by
+		 * assuming that no two timestamps in sequence have
+		 * the same nanosecond value.
+		 *
+		 * So, we read the "low" register, read the "high"
+		 * register (to latch a new timestamp) and read the
+		 * "low" register again, if "old" and "new" versions
+		 * of the "low" register are different, a valid
+		 * timestamp was captured, we can read the "high"
+		 * register again.
+		 */
+		u32 txstmpl_old, txstmpl_new;
+
+		txstmpl_old = rd32(IGC_TXSTMPL);
+		rd32(IGC_TXSTMPH);
+		txstmpl_new = rd32(IGC_TXSTMPL);
+
+		if (txstmpl_old == txstmpl_new)
+			return;
+
+		regval = txstmpl_new;
+		regval |= (u64)rd32(IGC_TXSTMPH) << 32;
+	}
 	if (igc_ptp_systim_to_hwtstamp(adapter, &shhwtstamps, regval))
 		return;
 
@@ -730,22 +765,13 @@ static void igc_ptp_tx_hwtstamp(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
  */
 void igc_ptp_tx_tstamp_event(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
 {
-	struct igc_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	u32 tsynctxctl;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->ptp_tx_lock, flags);
 
 	if (!adapter->ptp_tx_skb)
 		goto unlock;
 
-	tsynctxctl = rd32(IGC_TSYNCTXCTL);
-	tsynctxctl &= IGC_TSYNCTXCTL_TXTT_0;
-	if (!tsynctxctl) {
-		WARN_ONCE(1, "Received a TSTAMP interrupt but no TSTAMP is ready.\n");
-		goto unlock;
-	}
-
 	igc_ptp_tx_hwtstamp(adapter);
 
 unlock:
-- 
2.40.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-06  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-06  1:33 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v3 0/4] igc: TX timestamping fixes Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-06-06  1:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v3 1/4] igc: Fix race condition in PTP tx code Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-06-06  1:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v3 2/4] igc: Check if hardware TX timestamping is enabled earlier Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-06-06  1:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v3 3/4] igc: Retrieve TX timestamp during interrupt handling Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-06-06  7:08   ` Miroslav Lichvar
2023-06-06  1:33 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes [this message]
2023-06-06  5:07   ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v3 4/4] igc: Add workaround for missing timestamps Paul Menzel
2023-06-07 17:29     ` Vinicius Costa Gomes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230606013325.602823-5-vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
    --to=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox