From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 20/24] net: intel: Use nested-BH locking for XDP redirect.
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 17:01:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231219000116.GA3956476@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202312161212.D5tju5i6-lkp@intel.com>
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 12:53:43PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on net-next/main]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sebastian-Andrzej-Siewior/locking-local_lock-Introduce-guard-definition-for-local_lock/20231216-011911
> base: net-next/main
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215171020.687342-21-bigeasy%40linutronix.de
> patch subject: [PATCH net-next 20/24] net: intel: Use nested-BH locking for XDP redirect.
> config: arm-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231216/202312161212.D5tju5i6-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231216/202312161212.D5tju5i6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312161212.D5tju5i6-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:8620:3: error: cannot jump from this goto statement to its label
> goto xdp_out;
> ^
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:8624:2: note: jump bypasses initialization of variable with __attribute__((cleanup))
> guard(local_lock_nested_bh)(&bpf_run_lock.redirect_lock);
> ^
> include/linux/cleanup.h:142:15: note: expanded from macro 'guard'
> CLASS(_name, __UNIQUE_ID(guard))
> ^
> include/linux/compiler.h:180:29: note: expanded from macro '__UNIQUE_ID'
> #define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __COUNTER__)
> ^
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:84:22: note: expanded from macro '__PASTE'
> #define __PASTE(a,b) ___PASTE(a,b)
> ^
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:83:23: note: expanded from macro '___PASTE'
> #define ___PASTE(a,b) a##b
> ^
> <scratch space>:52:1: note: expanded from here
> __UNIQUE_ID_guard753
> ^
> 1 error generated.
I initially thought that this may have been
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1886 but asm goto is not
involved here.
This error occurs because jumping over the initialization of a variable
declared with __attribute__((__cleanup__(...))) does not prevent the
clean up function from running as one may expect it to, but could
instead result in the clean up function getting run on uninitialized
memory. A contrived example (see the bottom of the "Output" tabs for the
execution output):
https://godbolt.org/z/9bvGboxvc
While there is a warning from GCC in that example, I don't see one in
the kernel's case. I see there is an open GCC issue around this problem:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91951
While it is possible that there may not actually be a problem with how
the kernel uses __attribute__((__cleanup__(...))) and gotos, I think
clang's behavior is reasonable given the potential footguns that this
construct has.
Cheers,
Nathan
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-19 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20231215171020.687342-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
2023-12-15 17:07 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 20/24] net: intel: Use nested-BH locking for XDP redirect Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-12-16 4:53 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-19 0:01 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2023-12-19 16:55 ` Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231219000116.GA3956476@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox