From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0F95C54798 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54910406F2; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:54:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZN2NXLMPJ41i; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:54:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.34; helo=ash.osuosl.org; envelope-from=intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org; receiver= DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 5C8BB4074A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=osuosl.org; s=default; t=1709668496; bh=QE1tVUAsy/hkSSeuCWKZiVp2eupHugxc005RYWzTphk=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc:From; b=pBdf7pPF2GiO+OmC0F5KbIG4FdTOUuWxjJehZTln4uUR63xcaQDtFPn+sxdcDlL2U aUvysovTUB4igk2ms6D8QUsDOYMii5JjBqoF+sPhk5wxTyUXeFyEotHGO4Dbcj72HD RKlpfGm4BJizcHQMiBJkU7tpCOtPivLfzh2TyJAklswMzSD/WLO/J+DZ6cLjiJgagr 4AaTHfeG7N+5otgxyyFGF73nj1dn2SA2KRK9d6FGI6TNEU0Fblz15Yi/VYCdxS4DoG wodUjBgVybzPJLuB42fZ/MHL9COJO0o/jQ/VEJNoy756PCj6gNlgkPzIGgV5RFzz8c hb1gT6HRN2Zrg== Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8BB4074A; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC9D1BF3A4 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75D882A0B for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:54:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3j3Lo56uaD68 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2604:1380:4641:c500::1; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=kuba@kernel.org; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp1.osuosl.org 0553682768 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 0553682768 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0553682768 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3F461575; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A71B3C433F1; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:54:50 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Larysa Zaremba Message-ID: <20240305115450.577c161e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240228155957.408036-1-larysa.zaremba@intel.com> <20240228084745.2c0fef0e@kernel.org> <20240229072813.5d7614c3@kernel.org> <20240301090836.185e3b79@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709668492; bh=gntd/YhRPEAN2+Z16W3V+ZZ+Frwia39/RWn+d6a3EcQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lxte8lc0Jppw6kKqg7dMmphrkb66r7fSWpzIBGQScH3qVouaLwS9X4lbSspmbLj7X FYpmoJT1SaeEwQCxuNe9cEtjaXBc3KJ12P+rNHpsoDWNOHfypEvo5zJZCY5DhZty+H /6BbaHVMHH3mYQWxEwwQuWGX8Ek+ePmHxIi5LXldaVKLpeLR5AHYtH/j6YnkYBuB/V lySQnFe27R/KHt23pqZGICCc+/5U0VAR+OyZ2A6/GQ2uPbaQL22Wficrc1Bkf7YvUt URX19gVDZ8l8b2a079SeXZwNaXzRPBe/8IUY2BaJl777Rei3mgUexeIEzzHfw0Wm/C Gqez787JWGetw== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=lxte8lc0 Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net 0/5] ice: LLDP support for VFs X-BeenThere: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Wired Ethernet Linux Kernel Driver Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Michal Swiatkowski , Jiri Pirko , Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" , Mateusz Pacuszka , Mateusz Polchlopek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Buchocki , Pawel Chmielewski , Lukasz Plachno , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Pawel Kaminski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tony Nguyen , Paolo Abeni , Przemek Kitszel Errors-To: intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org Sender: "Intel-wired-lan" On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 01:50:03 +0100 Larysa Zaremba wrote: > For RX: match on Ethertype and mirror, every trusted VF should be able to scan > neighbors. > > For TX this is more complicated and is done not through eswitch, but through > modifying security options, so do not think this would work with tc. So private > flags are the best option? Our requirements say only a single VSI can transmit > LLDP. It is doable theoretically, tho, right? Driver can detect that all eswitch VF/PF ports but one have a "drop LLDP" rule and update the security option correctly?