From: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] ice: use irq_update_affinity_hint()
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 01:12:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240522231256.587985-1-mschmidt@redhat.com> (raw)
irq_set_affinity_hint() is deprecated. Use irq_update_affinity_hint()
instead. This removes the side-effect of actually applying the affinity.
The driver does not really need to worry about spreading its IRQs across
CPUs. The core code already takes care of that.
On the contrary, when the driver applies affinities by itself, it breaks
the users' expectations:
1. The user configures irqbalance with IRQBALANCE_BANNED_CPULIST in
order to prevent IRQs from being moved to certain CPUs that run a
real-time workload.
2. ice reconfigures VSIs at runtime due to a MIB change
(ice_dcb_process_lldp_set_mib_change). Reopening a VSI resets the
affinity in ice_vsi_req_irq_msix().
3. ice has no idea about irqbalance's config, so it may move an IRQ to
a banned CPU. The real-time workload suffers unacceptable latency.
I am not sure if updating the affinity hints is at all useful, because
irqbalance ignores them since 2016 ([1]), but at least it's harmless.
This ice change is similar to i40e commit d34c54d1739c ("i40e: Use
irq_update_affinity_hint()").
[1] https://github.com/Irqbalance/irqbalance/commit/dcc411e7bfdd
Signed-off-by: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 4 ++--
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
index 5371e91f6bbb..0f8b622db2b5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
@@ -2587,8 +2587,8 @@ void ice_vsi_free_irq(struct ice_vsi *vsi)
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL))
irq_set_affinity_notifier(irq_num, NULL);
- /* clear the affinity_mask in the IRQ descriptor */
- irq_set_affinity_hint(irq_num, NULL);
+ /* clear the affinity_hint in the IRQ descriptor */
+ irq_update_affinity_hint(irq_num, NULL);
synchronize_irq(irq_num);
devm_free_irq(ice_pf_to_dev(pf), irq_num, vsi->q_vectors[i]);
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
index f60c022f7960..a5d369b8fed5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
@@ -2607,7 +2607,7 @@ static int ice_vsi_req_irq_msix(struct ice_vsi *vsi, char *basename)
}
/* assign the mask for this irq */
- irq_set_affinity_hint(irq_num, &q_vector->affinity_mask);
+ irq_update_affinity_hint(irq_num, &q_vector->affinity_mask);
}
err = ice_set_cpu_rx_rmap(vsi);
@@ -2625,7 +2625,7 @@ static int ice_vsi_req_irq_msix(struct ice_vsi *vsi, char *basename)
irq_num = vsi->q_vectors[vector]->irq.virq;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL))
irq_set_affinity_notifier(irq_num, NULL);
- irq_set_affinity_hint(irq_num, NULL);
+ irq_update_affinity_hint(irq_num, NULL);
devm_free_irq(dev, irq_num, &vsi->q_vectors[vector]);
}
return err;
--
2.44.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-05-22 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-22 23:12 Michal Schmidt [this message]
2024-05-23 6:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [EXTERNAL] [PATCH iwl-next] ice: use irq_update_affinity_hint() Sunil Kovvuri Goutham
2024-05-23 17:53 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jacob Keller
2024-05-24 21:04 ` Jacob Keller
2024-05-28 6:16 ` Michal Schmidt
2024-05-28 16:00 ` Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240522231256.587985-1-mschmidt@redhat.com \
--to=mschmidt@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nitesh@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox