Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>
To: Brian Vazquez <brianvv.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	 Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: David Decotigny <decot@google.com>,
	Vivek Kumar <vivekmr@google.com>,
	 Anjali Singhai <anjali.singhai@intel.com>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	 emil.s.tantilov@intel.com,
	Marco Leogrande <leogrande@google.com>,
	 Manoj Vishwanathan <manojvishy@google.com>,
	Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>,
	Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
	Pavan Kumar Linga <pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next PATCH v3 2/3] idpf: convert workqueues to unbound
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 23:33:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241212233333.3743239-3-brianvv@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241212233333.3743239-1-brianvv@google.com>

From: Marco Leogrande <leogrande@google.com>

When a workqueue is created with `WQ_UNBOUND`, its work items are
served by special worker-pools, whose host workers are not bound to
any specific CPU. In the default configuration (i.e. when
`queue_delayed_work` and friends do not specify which CPU to run the
work item on), `WQ_UNBOUND` allows the work item to be executed on any
CPU in the same node of the CPU it was enqueued on. While this
solution potentially sacrifices locality, it avoids contention with
other processes that might dominate the CPU time of the processor the
work item was scheduled on.

This is not just a theoretical problem: in a particular scenario
misconfigured process was hogging most of the time from CPU0, leaving
less than 0.5% of its CPU time to the kworker. The IDPF workqueues
that were using the kworker on CPU0 suffered large completion delays
as a result, causing performance degradation, timeouts and eventual
system crash.

Tested:

* I have also run a manual test to gauge the performance
  improvement. The test consists of an antagonist process
  (`./stress --cpu 2`) consuming as much of CPU 0 as possible. This
  process is run under `taskset 01` to bind it to CPU0, and its
  priority is changed with `chrt -pQ 9900 10000 ${pid}` and
  `renice -n -20 ${pid}` after start.

  Then, the IDPF driver is forced to prefer CPU0 by editing all calls
  to `queue_delayed_work`, `mod_delayed_work`, etc... to use CPU 0.

  Finally, `ktraces` for the workqueue events are collected.

  Without the current patch, the antagonist process can force
  arbitrary delays between `workqueue_queue_work` and
  `workqueue_execute_start`, that in my tests were as high as
  `30ms`. With the current patch applied, the workqueue can be
  migrated to another unloaded CPU in the same node, and, keeping
  everything else equal, the maximum delay I could see was `6us`.

Fixes: 0fe45467a104 ("idpf: add create vport and netdev configuration")
Signed-off-by: Marco Leogrande <leogrande@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Manoj Vishwanathan <manojvishy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavan Kumar Linga <pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c
index 305958c4c230..da1e3525719f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c
@@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ static int idpf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 	pci_set_master(pdev);
 	pci_set_drvdata(pdev, adapter);
 
-	adapter->init_wq = alloc_workqueue("%s-%s-init", 0, 0,
+	adapter->init_wq = alloc_workqueue("%s-%s-init",
+					   WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0,
 					   dev_driver_string(dev),
 					   dev_name(dev));
 	if (!adapter->init_wq) {
@@ -207,7 +208,8 @@ static int idpf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 		goto err_free;
 	}
 
-	adapter->serv_wq = alloc_workqueue("%s-%s-service", 0, 0,
+	adapter->serv_wq = alloc_workqueue("%s-%s-service",
+					   WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0,
 					   dev_driver_string(dev),
 					   dev_name(dev));
 	if (!adapter->serv_wq) {
@@ -216,7 +218,8 @@ static int idpf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 		goto err_serv_wq_alloc;
 	}
 
-	adapter->mbx_wq = alloc_workqueue("%s-%s-mbx", 0, 0,
+	adapter->mbx_wq = alloc_workqueue("%s-%s-mbx",
+					  WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0,
 					  dev_driver_string(dev),
 					  dev_name(dev));
 	if (!adapter->mbx_wq) {
@@ -225,7 +228,8 @@ static int idpf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 		goto err_mbx_wq_alloc;
 	}
 
-	adapter->stats_wq = alloc_workqueue("%s-%s-stats", 0, 0,
+	adapter->stats_wq = alloc_workqueue("%s-%s-stats",
+					    WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0,
 					    dev_driver_string(dev),
 					    dev_name(dev));
 	if (!adapter->stats_wq) {
@@ -234,7 +238,8 @@ static int idpf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 		goto err_stats_wq_alloc;
 	}
 
-	adapter->vc_event_wq = alloc_workqueue("%s-%s-vc_event", 0, 0,
+	adapter->vc_event_wq = alloc_workqueue("%s-%s-vc_event",
+					       WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0,
 					       dev_driver_string(dev),
 					       dev_name(dev));
 	if (!adapter->vc_event_wq) {
-- 
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-12 23:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-12 23:33 [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next PATCH v3 0/3] IDPF Virtchnl: Enhance error reporting & fix locking/workqueue issues Brian Vazquez
2024-12-12 23:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next PATCH v3 1/3] idpf: Acquire the lock before accessing the xn->salt Brian Vazquez
2024-12-12 23:33 ` Brian Vazquez [this message]
2024-12-12 23:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next PATCH v3 3/3] idpf: add more info during virtchnl transaction time out Brian Vazquez
2024-12-13  9:36   ` Paul Menzel
2024-12-16 16:25     ` Brian Vazquez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241212233333.3743239-3-brianvv@google.com \
    --to=brianvv@google.com \
    --cc=anjali.singhai@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=brianvv.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=decot@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leogrande@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manojvishy@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
    --cc=vivekmr@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox