Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, bjorn@kernel.org,
	magnus.karlsson@intel.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com,
	jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 2/2] igb: xsk: solve underflow of nb_pkts in zerocopy mode
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 11:12:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250721101217.GC2459@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250721083343.16482-3-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 04:33:43PM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
> 
> There is no break time in the while() loop, so every time at the end of
> igb_xmit_zc(), underflow of nb_pkts will occur, which renders the return
> value always false. But theoretically, the result should be set after
> calling xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(). We can take i40e_xmit_zc() as
> a good example.
> 
> Returning false means we're not done with transmission and we need one
> more poll, which is exactly what igb_xmit_zc() always did before this
> patch. After this patch, the return value depends on the nb_pkts value.
> Two cases might happen then:
> 1. if (nb_pkts < budget), it means we process all the possible data, so
>    return true and no more necessary poll will be triggered because of
>    this.
> 2. if (nb_pkts == budget), it means we might have more data, so return
>    false to let another poll run again.
> 
> Fixes: f8e284a02afc ("igb: Add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support")
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c
> index 5cf67ba29269..243f4246fee8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c
> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ bool igb_xmit_zc(struct igb_ring *tx_ring, struct xsk_buff_pool *xsk_pool)
>  	if (!nb_pkts)
>  		return true;
>  
> -	while (nb_pkts-- > 0) {
> +	while (i < nb_pkts) {

Hi Jason,

FWIIW, I think using a for loop is a more idiomatic way
of handling the relationship between i, nb_pkts, and
the iterations of this loop.

>  		dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xsk_pool, descs[i].addr);
>  		xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xsk_pool, dma, descs[i].len);
>  
> -- 
> 2.41.3
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-21 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-21  8:33 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 0/2] xsk: fix underflow issues in zerocopy xmit Jason Xing
2025-07-21  8:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 1/2] stmmac: xsk: fix underflow of budget in zerocopy mode Jason Xing
2025-07-21  8:56   ` Paul Menzel
2025-07-21  9:15     ` Jason Xing
2025-07-22 14:16       ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-07-22 15:53         ` Jason Xing
2025-07-22 17:29           ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-07-22 23:04             ` Jason Xing
2025-07-21 15:37   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-07-21 23:05     ` Jason Xing
2025-07-22  0:12       ` Jason Xing
2025-07-21  8:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 2/2] igb: xsk: solve underflow of nb_pkts " Jason Xing
2025-07-21 10:12   ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-07-21 10:22     ` Jason Xing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250721101217.GC2459@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox