From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 2/6] ice: pass pointer to ice_fetch_u64_stats_per_ring
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 12:20:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251120-jk-refactor-queue-stats-v4-2-6e8b0cea75cc@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251120-jk-refactor-queue-stats-v4-0-6e8b0cea75cc@intel.com>
The ice_fetch_u64_stats_per_ring function takes a pointer to the syncp from
the ring stats to synchronize reading of the packet stats. It also takes a
*copy* of the ice_q_stats fields instead of a pointer to the stats. This
completely defeats the point of using the u64_stats API. We pass the stats
by value, so they are static at the point of reading within the
u64_stats_fetch_retry loop.
Simplify the function to take a pointer to the ice_ring_stats instead of
two separate parameters. Additionally, since we never call this outside of
ice_main.c, make it a static function.
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice.h | 3 ---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice.h
index 147aaee192a7..5c01e886e83e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice.h
@@ -957,9 +957,6 @@ u16 ice_get_avail_rxq_count(struct ice_pf *pf);
int ice_vsi_recfg_qs(struct ice_vsi *vsi, int new_rx, int new_tx, bool locked);
void ice_update_vsi_stats(struct ice_vsi *vsi);
void ice_update_pf_stats(struct ice_pf *pf);
-void
-ice_fetch_u64_stats_per_ring(struct u64_stats_sync *syncp,
- struct ice_q_stats stats, u64 *pkts, u64 *bytes);
int ice_up(struct ice_vsi *vsi);
int ice_down(struct ice_vsi *vsi);
int ice_down_up(struct ice_vsi *vsi);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
index 0b6175ade40d..4133d297dda2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
@@ -6811,25 +6811,23 @@ int ice_up(struct ice_vsi *vsi)
/**
* ice_fetch_u64_stats_per_ring - get packets and bytes stats per ring
- * @syncp: pointer to u64_stats_sync
- * @stats: stats that pkts and bytes count will be taken from
+ * @stats: pointer to ring stats structure
* @pkts: packets stats counter
* @bytes: bytes stats counter
*
* This function fetches stats from the ring considering the atomic operations
* that needs to be performed to read u64 values in 32 bit machine.
*/
-void
-ice_fetch_u64_stats_per_ring(struct u64_stats_sync *syncp,
- struct ice_q_stats stats, u64 *pkts, u64 *bytes)
+static void ice_fetch_u64_stats_per_ring(struct ice_ring_stats *stats,
+ u64 *pkts, u64 *bytes)
{
unsigned int start;
do {
- start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(syncp);
- *pkts = stats.pkts;
- *bytes = stats.bytes;
- } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(syncp, start));
+ start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&stats->syncp);
+ *pkts = stats->stats.pkts;
+ *bytes = stats->stats.bytes;
+ } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&stats->syncp, start));
}
/**
@@ -6853,9 +6851,7 @@ ice_update_vsi_tx_ring_stats(struct ice_vsi *vsi,
ring = READ_ONCE(rings[i]);
if (!ring || !ring->ring_stats)
continue;
- ice_fetch_u64_stats_per_ring(&ring->ring_stats->syncp,
- ring->ring_stats->stats, &pkts,
- &bytes);
+ ice_fetch_u64_stats_per_ring(ring->ring_stats, &pkts, &bytes);
vsi_stats->tx_packets += pkts;
vsi_stats->tx_bytes += bytes;
vsi->tx_restart += ring->ring_stats->tx_stats.restart_q;
@@ -6899,9 +6895,7 @@ static void ice_update_vsi_ring_stats(struct ice_vsi *vsi)
struct ice_ring_stats *ring_stats;
ring_stats = ring->ring_stats;
- ice_fetch_u64_stats_per_ring(&ring_stats->syncp,
- ring_stats->stats, &pkts,
- &bytes);
+ ice_fetch_u64_stats_per_ring(ring_stats, &pkts, &bytes);
vsi_stats->rx_packets += pkts;
vsi_stats->rx_bytes += bytes;
vsi->rx_buf_failed += ring_stats->rx_stats.alloc_buf_failed;
--
2.51.0.rc1.197.g6d975e95c9d7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 20:20 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 0/6] ice: properly use u64_stats API for all ring stats Jacob Keller
2025-11-20 20:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 1/6] ice: initialize ring_stats->syncp Jacob Keller
2025-11-25 10:15 ` Simon Horman
2025-12-03 22:23 ` Jacob Keller
2025-12-04 12:13 ` Simon Horman
2025-11-20 20:20 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
2025-11-25 10:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 2/6] ice: pass pointer to ice_fetch_u64_stats_per_ring Simon Horman
2025-12-03 22:12 ` Jacob Keller
2025-11-20 20:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 3/6] ice: remove ice_q_stats struct and use struct_group Jacob Keller
2025-11-25 10:16 ` Simon Horman
2025-12-03 22:14 ` Jacob Keller
2025-11-20 20:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 4/6] ice: use u64_stats API to access pkts/bytes in dim sample Jacob Keller
2025-11-25 10:17 ` Simon Horman
2025-11-20 20:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 5/6] ice: shorten ring stat names and add accessors Jacob Keller
2025-11-25 10:17 ` Simon Horman
2025-12-03 22:17 ` Jacob Keller
2025-11-20 20:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 6/6] ice: convert all ring stats to u64_stats_t Jacob Keller
2025-11-25 10:17 ` Simon Horman
2025-12-03 22:21 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251120-jk-refactor-queue-stats-v4-2-6e8b0cea75cc@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).