Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: mheib@redhat.com
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	jiri@resnulli.us, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net,
	anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/2] i40e: move ATR sample rate from ring to PF level
Date: Wed,  8 Jul 2026 15:36:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708143601.1491656-1-horms@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701093830.948756-1-mheib@redhat.com>

This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
Full review at: https://sashiko.dev
---
i40e: move ATR sample rate from ring to PF level

This commit moves the ATR sample rate configuration from the per-ring level
to the PF level. It initializes the sample rate globally during software init
and updates the fast path to reference the PF structure.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> index a04683004a567..4d4d4b07a0f3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3454,12 +3454,7 @@ static int i40e_configure_tx_ring(struct i40e_ring *ring)
>  		ring->xsk_pool = i40e_xsk_pool(ring);
>  
>  	/* some ATR related tx ring init */
> -	if (test_bit(I40E_FLAG_FD_ATR_ENA, vsi->back->flags)) {
> -		ring->atr_sample_rate = I40E_DEFAULT_ATR_SAMPLE_RATE;
> -		ring->atr_count = 0;
> -	} else {
> -		ring->atr_sample_rate = 0;
> -	}
> +	ring->atr_count = 0;

[Severity: High]
Does removing this per-ring initialization remove the protection against
dynamic ethtool flag toggles?

Previously, if the ring was configured while Flow Director ATR was disabled,
the ring's sample rate was cached to 0 in i40e_configure_tx_ring(). This
prevented descriptor injection even if the PF flag was later toggled on
without a ring reset.

[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> index 894f2d06d39d0..b36e0fc9b31d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2879,7 +2879,7 @@ static void i40e_atr(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* if sampling is disabled do nothing */
> -	if (!tx_ring->atr_sample_rate)
> +	if (!pf->atr_sample_rate)
>  		return;

[Severity: High]
Can this global check lead to a hardware Malicious Driver Detection (MDD)
event if ethtool flags are modified dynamically?

If an administrator performs the following sequence:

1. Disables flow-director-atr via ethtool.
2. Disables ntuple (which resets the ring and sets tx_ctx.fd_ena = 0).
3. Re-enables flow-director-atr.

The final step does not trigger a ring reset, so fd_ena remains 0 in the
hardware queue context.

However, I40E_FLAG_FD_ATR_ENA is now true, and pf->atr_sample_rate is
globally set to a non-zero value.

Will i40e_atr() now proceed and inject FDIR descriptors into a TX queue
that is not configured for FDIR?

If so, does this cause the hardware to trigger an MDD event and hang the
TX queue?

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01  9:38 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/2] i40e: move ATR sample rate from ring to PF level mheib
2026-07-01  9:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 2/2] i40e: add devlink parameter for Flow Director ATR sample rate mheib
2026-07-08 14:36   ` Simon Horman
2026-07-08 14:36 ` Simon Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260708143601.1491656-1-horms@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mheib@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox