From: xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev
To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, horms@kernel.org
Cc: vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
piotr.kwapulinski@intel.com, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com,
aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 4/5] i40e: replace reset polling with wait-bit synchronization
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 14:51:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805065132.148625-5-xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805065132.148625-1-xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev>
From: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>
i40e_remove() polls on RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING with a fixed sleep while
waiting for an existing reset owner. This adds teardown latency and does
not provide a wait queue for the reset owner to wake.
Use wait_on_bit_lock() so removal sleeps until the reset owner releases the
bit and then atomically claims it. Pair the reset release paths with
clear_and_wake_up_bit() to provide the required release and wakeup
semantics.
Fixes: 5b6d4a7f20b0 ("i40e: Fix crash during removing i40e driver")
Signed-off-by: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
index 5922f83f324ae..c19d4c81d6532 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/if_bridge.h>
#include <linux/if_macvlan.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/wait_bit.h>
#include <net/pkt_cls.h>
#include <net/xdp_sock_drv.h>
@@ -10822,7 +10823,8 @@ static int i40e_reset(struct i40e_pf *pf)
if (ret) {
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "PF reset failed, %d\n", ret);
set_bit(__I40E_RESET_FAILED, pf->state);
- clear_bit(__I40E_RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING, pf->state);
+ clear_and_wake_up_bit(__I40E_RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING,
+ pf->state);
} else {
pf->pfr_count++;
}
@@ -11115,7 +11117,7 @@ static void i40e_rebuild(struct i40e_pf *pf, bool reinit, bool lock_acquired)
end_core_reset:
clear_bit(__I40E_RESET_FAILED, pf->state);
clear_recovery:
- clear_bit(__I40E_RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING, pf->state);
+ clear_and_wake_up_bit(__I40E_RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING, pf->state);
clear_bit(__I40E_TIMEOUT_RECOVERY_PENDING, pf->state);
}
@@ -16169,8 +16171,8 @@ static void i40e_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
disable_work_sync(&pf->service_task);
/* Wait for any reset owner before tearing down device resources. */
- while (test_and_set_bit(__I40E_RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING, pf->state))
- usleep_range(1000, 2000);
+ wait_on_bit_lock(pf->state, __I40E_RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
set_bit(__I40E_IN_REMOVE, pf->state);
i40e_dbg_pf_exit(pf);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 6:51 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 0/5] i40e: fix PTP work and teardown races xuanqiang.luo
2026-08-05 6:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 1/5] i40e: serialize Tx timestamp skb ownership xuanqiang.luo
2026-08-05 6:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 2/5] i40e: serialize timestamp configuration with PTP teardown xuanqiang.luo
2026-08-05 6:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 3/5] i40e: synchronize reset recovery with device removal xuanqiang.luo
2026-08-05 6:51 ` xuanqiang.luo [this message]
2026-08-05 6:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 5/5] i40e: fix races in PTP external timestamp work handling xuanqiang.luo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805065132.148625-5-xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev \
--to=xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=piotr.kwapulinski@intel.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox