Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev
To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, horms@kernel.org
Cc: vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
	przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
	piotr.kwapulinski@intel.com, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com,
	aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 4/5] i40e: replace reset polling with wait-bit synchronization
Date: Wed,  5 Aug 2026 14:51:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805065132.148625-5-xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805065132.148625-1-xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev>

From: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>

i40e_remove() polls on RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING with a fixed sleep while
waiting for an existing reset owner. This adds teardown latency and does
not provide a wait queue for the reset owner to wake.

Use wait_on_bit_lock() so removal sleeps until the reset owner releases the
bit and then atomically claims it. Pair the reset release paths with
clear_and_wake_up_bit() to provide the required release and wakeup
semantics.

Fixes: 5b6d4a7f20b0 ("i40e: Fix crash during removing i40e driver")
Signed-off-by: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
index 5922f83f324ae..c19d4c81d6532 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 #include <linux/if_bridge.h>
 #include <linux/if_macvlan.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/wait_bit.h>
 #include <net/pkt_cls.h>
 #include <net/xdp_sock_drv.h>
 
@@ -10822,7 +10823,8 @@ static int i40e_reset(struct i40e_pf *pf)
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "PF reset failed, %d\n", ret);
 		set_bit(__I40E_RESET_FAILED, pf->state);
-		clear_bit(__I40E_RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING, pf->state);
+		clear_and_wake_up_bit(__I40E_RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING,
+				      pf->state);
 	} else {
 		pf->pfr_count++;
 	}
@@ -11115,7 +11117,7 @@ static void i40e_rebuild(struct i40e_pf *pf, bool reinit, bool lock_acquired)
 end_core_reset:
 	clear_bit(__I40E_RESET_FAILED, pf->state);
 clear_recovery:
-	clear_bit(__I40E_RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING, pf->state);
+	clear_and_wake_up_bit(__I40E_RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING, pf->state);
 	clear_bit(__I40E_TIMEOUT_RECOVERY_PENDING, pf->state);
 }
 
@@ -16169,8 +16171,8 @@ static void i40e_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 		disable_work_sync(&pf->service_task);
 
 	/* Wait for any reset owner before tearing down device resources. */
-	while (test_and_set_bit(__I40E_RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING, pf->state))
-		usleep_range(1000, 2000);
+	wait_on_bit_lock(pf->state, __I40E_RESET_RECOVERY_PENDING,
+			 TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 	set_bit(__I40E_IN_REMOVE, pf->state);
 
 	i40e_dbg_pf_exit(pf);
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-05  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-05  6:51 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 0/5] i40e: fix PTP work and teardown races xuanqiang.luo
2026-08-05  6:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 1/5] i40e: serialize Tx timestamp skb ownership xuanqiang.luo
2026-08-05  6:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 2/5] i40e: serialize timestamp configuration with PTP teardown xuanqiang.luo
2026-08-05  6:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 3/5] i40e: synchronize reset recovery with device removal xuanqiang.luo
2026-08-05  6:51 ` xuanqiang.luo [this message]
2026-08-05  6:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 5/5] i40e: fix races in PTP external timestamp work handling xuanqiang.luo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260805065132.148625-5-xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev \
    --to=xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev \
    --cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=piotr.kwapulinski@intel.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox